Modern methodology for improving bone tissue regeneration in dentistry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.3.8-14

Keywords:

bone tissue, osteoregeneration, remodeling

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate modern techniques for improving bone tissue regeneration. To achieve this goal, we reviewed sources from domestic and international scientific medical literature. Results. Maxillary bone loss can result from chronic dental diseases, trauma, or tumor resection. Bone resorption, most often caused by infection or inflammation, can lead to discomfort, deformity, and complications during dental implant placement. While implants can restore oral function, many patients lack sufficient bone volume for their placement. Therefore, several techniques are used to address this problem. Guided bone regeneration promotes the growth of new bone in damaged areas of the jaw. Despite its effectiveness, this method can be time-consuming to achieve sufficient bone volume. The PASS principle (Primary closure, Angiogenesis, Space maintenance, and Stability) is considered fundamental for successful guided bone regeneration. Guided tissue regeneration utilizes two main types of barrier membranes: resorbable and non-resorbable membranes. Recent advancements in titanium mesh technology include individually pre-bent meshes tailored to specific defect geometries. Distraction osteogenesis offers significant advantages over traditional bone grafting techniques, eliminating the need for donor bone and avoiding complications associated with donor site morbidity. Despite its advantages, distraction osteogenesis is associated with certain challenges. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining popularity in dentistry due to its ability to accelerate healing and promote tissue regeneration. PRP's capacity to release high concentrations of growth factors makes it an effective tool in stimulating stem cell activity, promoting tissue healing, and enhancing bone and soft tissue regeneration. Stem cell therapy holds significant promise for the regeneration of teeth, bone tissue, and periodontal structures, making it a key area in modern dental tissue engineering. Conclusion. A review of the scientific literature reveals some inconsistencies regarding the effectiveness of the aforementioned guided bone regeneration techniques and an understanding of the situational variations in bone tissue reconstruction across different clinical scenarios. Modern techniques for improving bone tissue regeneration aim to create optimal conditions for natural bone regeneration through the use of biocompatible materials, guided surgical techniques, biologically active factors, and individualized approaches based on a deep understanding of bone tissue histoarchitecture. A significant number of scientific works, both experimental and clinical, are dedicated to the study of osteoregeneration; however, under current conditions, a correct understanding of the sequence and timeframes of osteogenic regenerative processes is of particular importance. Therefore, the pursuit of further research into modern techniques and their associated dynamics of histoarchitectural remodeling during bone defect healing is justified. This will allow for the development of personalized osteoregeneration strategies tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

References

  1. Jimi E, Hirata S, Osawa K, Terashita M, Kitamura C, Fukushima H. The current and future therapies of bone regeneration to repair bone defects. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1-7. doi: 10.1155/2012/ 148261.
  2. Sahrmann P, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis using bone substitutes and membrane: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13(1):46-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00183.x.
  3. Kim YK, Ku JK. Guided bone regeneration. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46(5): 361-6. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.5.361.
  4. Wang H-L, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):8-17. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000204762. 39826.0f.
  5. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: A prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(3):299-307. doi: 10.11607/prd.1407.
  6. Gielkens PFM, Bos RRM, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B. Is there evidence that barrier membranes prevent bone resorption in autologous bone grafts during the healing period? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(3):390-8.
  7. Bunyaratavej P, Wang H. Collagen membranes: A review. J Periodontol. 2001;72(2):215-29. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215.
  8. Oh T, Meraw SJ, Lee E, Giannobile W V., Wang H. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):80-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x.
  9. Jung RE, Kokovic V, Jurisic M, Yaman D, Subramani K, Weber FE. Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):802-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010. 02068.x.
  10. Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K. Current barrier membranes: Titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001.
  11. Lindfors LT, Tervonen EAT, Sándor GKB, Ylikontiola LP. Guided bone regeneration using a titanium-reinforced ePTFE membrane and particulate autogenous bone: the effect of smoking and membrane exposure. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2010;109(6):825-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009. 12.035.
  12. Herzberg R. Vertical guided bone regeneration for a single missing tooth span with titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membranes: clinical considerations and observations of 10 consecutive cases with up to 36 months follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(6):893-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.3380.
  13. Hartmann A, Hildebrandt H, Schmohl JU, Kämmerer PW. Evaluation of risk parameters in bone regeneration using a customized titanium mesh. Implant Dent. 2019;Publish Ah. doi: 10.1097/ ID.0000000000000933.
  14. Miron R, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Buser D, Zhang Y, Bosshardt D, Sculean A. Combination of collagen barrier membrane with enamel matrix derivative-liquid improves osteoblast adhesion and differentiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1): 196-203. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5011.
  15. Cucchi A, Vignudelli E, Napolitano A, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(5):821-32. doi: 10.1111/cid.12520.
  16. Veziroglu F, Soydan SS, Çetinşahin A, Uckan S. Maxillomandibular fixation screws for early removal of hardware and correction of lingual tilting in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;68(7):1651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.082.
  17. Hamdy, C. R, Rendon, S. J, Tabrizi M. Distraction osteogenesis and its challenges in bone regeneration. Bone Regeneration, InTech; 2012, p. 177-204. doi: 10.5772/32229.
  18. Yang S, Wang N, Ma Y, Guo S, Guo S, Sun H. Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41368-021-00156-y.
  19. Shakir S, Bartlett SP. Modern mandibular distraction applications in hemifacial microsomia. Clin Plast Surg. 2021;48(3):375-89. doi: 10.1016/ j.cps.2021.02.001.
  20. Gu L, Wang P, Du Q, Zhang Z, An Y, Li G, et al. Thirty years later: what has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(7):892e-3e. doi: 10.1097/ PRS.0000000000007832.
  21. Hatefi S, Hatefi K, Le Roux F, Alizargar J, Behdadipour Z, et al. Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00761-8.
  22. Rachmiel A, Emodi O, Aizenbud D. Management of obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric craniofacial anomalies. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012;2(2):111. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101329.
  23. Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Pillar G, Srouji S, Peled M. Bilateral mandibular distraction for patients with compromised airway analyzed by three-dimensional CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.05.010.
  24. Rachmiel A, Shilo D. The use of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015;5(2):146. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.175777.
  25. Jensen JN, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Nusbaum AO, Eski M. Bone deposition/generation with LeFort III (Midface) distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):298-307. doi: 10.1097/01.prs. 0000244865.80498.95.
  26. Kaban LB, Seldin EB, Kikinis R, Yeshwant K, Padwa BL, Troulis MJ. Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(5):996-1008. doi: 10.1016/ j.joms.2009.01.010.
  27. Marcantonio C, Nícoli L, Pigossi S, Araújo R de SB, Boeck E, Junior E. Use of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for anterior maxillary defect reconstruction. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(4):381. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_549_18.
  28. Vega LG, Bilbao A. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant preparation: an update. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(3): 369-85. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.004.
  29. Farr S, Mindler G, Ganger R, Girsch W. Bone lengthening in the pediatric upper extremity. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2016;98(17): 1490-503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00007.
  30. Cervantes J, Perper M, Wong LL, Eber AE, Villasante Fricke AC, Wikramanayake TC, et al. Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: a review of the literature. Skin Appendage Disord. 2018;4(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000477671.
  31. Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what is prp and what is not PRP? Implant Dent. 2001; 10(4):225-8. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200110000-00002.
  32. Andia I, Abate M. Platelet-rich plasma: underlying biology and clinical correlates. Regenerative Med. 2013;8(5):645-58. doi: 10.2217/rme.13.59.
  33. Rodriguez IA, Growney Kalaf EA, Bowlin GL, Sell SA. Platelet-rich plasma in bone regeneration: engineering the delivery for improved clinical efficacy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1-15. doi: 10.1155/2014/392398.
  34. Tözüm TF, Demiralp B. Platelet-rich plasma: a promising innovation in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(10):664.
  35. Sánchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:93-103.
  36. Suchetha A, Lakshmi P, Bhat D, Mundinamane D, Bharwani GA. Platelet concentration in platelet concentrates and periodontal regeneration-unscrambling the ambiguity. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(4):510. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X. 169850.
  37. Huang Y, Bornstein MM, Lambrichts I, Yu H-Y, Politis C, Jacobs R. Platelet-rich plasma for regeneration of neural feedback pathways around dental implants: a concise review and outlook on future possibilities. Int J Oral Sci. 2017;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2017.1.
  38. Albanese A, Licata ME, Polizzi B, Campisi G. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in dental and oral surgery: from the wound healing to bone regeneration. Immunity & Ageing. 2013;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/ 1742-4933-10-23.
  39. Meschi N, Castro AB, Vandamme K, Quirynen M, Lambrechts P. The impact of autologous platelet concentrates on endodontic healing: a systematic review. Platelets. 2016;27(7):613-33. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1226497.
  40. Gong T, Heng BC, Lo ECM, Zhang C. Current Advance and Future Prospects of Tissue Engineering Approach to Dentin/Pulp Regenerative Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2016:2016:9204574. doi: 10.1155/2016/9204574.
  41. Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS. Regenerative endodontic therapy in a single visit using platelet-rich plasma and biodentine in necrotic and asymptomatic immature molar teeth: a report of 3 cases. J Endod. 2016;42(9):1344-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.005.
  42. Sachdeva GS, Sachdeva LT, Goel M, Bala S. Regenerative endodontic treatment of an immature tooth with a necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis using platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): a case report. Int Endod J. 2015;48(9):902-10. doi: 10.1111/iej.12407.
  43. Alagl A, Bedi S, Hassan K, AlHumaid J. Use of platelet-rich plasma for regeneration in non-vital immature permanent teeth: Clinical and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Journal of International Medical Research. 2017;45(2):583-93. doi: 10.1177/0300060517692935.
  44. Bezgin T, Yilmaz AD, Celik BN, Kolsuz ME, Sonmez H. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma as a scaffold in regenerative endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2015;41(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014. 10.004.
  45. Xu J, Gou L, Zhang P, Li H, Qiu S. Platelet‐rich plasma and regenerative dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2020;65(2):131-42. doi: 10.1111/adj.12754.
  46. Vahabi S, Vaziri S, Torshabi M, Rezaei Esfahrood Z. Effects of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors and Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Proliferation and Viability of Human Gingival Fibroblasts. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(7):504-12.
  47. Saleem M, Pisani F, Zahid FM, Georgakopoulos I, Pustina-Krasniqi T, Xhajanka E, et al. Adjunctive platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in infrabony regenerative treatment: a systematic review and rct’s meta-analysis. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:1-10. doi: 10.1155/2018/9594235.
  48. Yang L, Hu S, Yan M, Yang J, Tsou S, Lin Y. Antimicrobial activity of platelet‐rich plasma and other plasma preparations against periodontal pathogens. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2):310-8. doi: 10.1902/ jop.2014.140373.
  49. Mehta S, Watson JT. Platelet rich concentrate: basic science and current clinical applications. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(6):432-8. doi: 10.1097/ BOT.0b013e31817e793f.
  50. Rahman E, Rao P, Abu-Farsakh HN, Thonse C, Ali I, Upton AE, et al. Systematic review of platelet-rich plasma in medical and surgical specialties: quality, evaluation, evidence, and enforcement. J Clin Med. 2024;13(15):4571. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154571.
  51. Wang J, Zhao Z, Yang K, Bai Y. Research progress in cell therapy for oral diseases: focus on cell sources and strategies to optimize cell function. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12. doi: 10.3389/ fbioe.2024.1340728.
  52. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H, Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006;24(5):1294-301. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342.
  53. Miura M, Gronthos S, Zhao M, Lu B, Fisher LW, Robey PG, et al. SHED: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(10):5807-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0937635100.
  54. Yumkham R, Nagarathna C, Sanjenbam N, Singh AG, Singh HP, Ashem A. Isolation and characterization of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Bioinformation. 2024;20(5):557-61. doi: 10.6026/973206300200557.
  55. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Fang D, Yamaza T, Seo B-M, Zhang C, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Mediated Functional Tooth Regeneration in Swine. PLoS One. 2006;1(1):e79. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0000079.
  56. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Yamaza T, Tuan RS, Wang S, Shi S, et al. Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: a pilot study. J Endod. 2008;34(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.021.
  57. Seo B-M, Miura M, Gronthos S, Mark Bartold P, Batouli S, Brahim J, et al. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. The Lancet. 2004;364(9429):149-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16627-0.
  58. Jain A, Bansal R. Current overview on dental stem cells applications in regenerative dentistry. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):29. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.149074.
  59. Yamada Y, Fujimoto A, Ito A, Yoshimi R, Ueda M. Cluster analysis and gene expression profiles: A cDNA microarray system-based comparison between human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) for tissue engineering cell therapy. Biomaterials. 2006;27(20): 3766-81. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.009.
  60. Alikhani M, Sangsuwon C, Alansari S, Nervina JM, Teixeira CC. High Frequency Acceleration: A New Tool for Alveolar Bone Regeneration. JSM Dent Surg. 2017;2(4):1026.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Dzupa , P., Stoj , O., & Chelpanova , I. (2025). Modern methodology for improving bone tissue regeneration in dentistry. Morphologia, 19(3), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.3.8-14

Issue

Section

Статті