Histogenetic and morphofunctional aspects of muscle tissue classification (review and research perspectives)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.4.95-103

Keywords:

histogenesis, muscle tissue, myogenesis, cardiogenesis, myoblast, cardiomyocyte, smooth muscle

Abstract

Introduction. Novel methods for determining the developmental pathways and formation of muscle tissue, whose main feature is the contraction mechanism, are gaining widespread use. Muscle tissue is a highly specialized structure responsible for the motor activity of an organism. Understanding its structure and histogenesis is critically important for studying both normal and pathological conditions. Research in embryology and histology, enhanced by modern methods of microscopy and molecular biology, allows for a new look at the fundamental mechanisms of muscle tissue development, which opens up new perspectives in the field of individual developmental biology, cytology and histology. The objective of this article is to systematize and integrate current scientific data on the histogenetic and morphofunctional aspects of muscle tissue classification. The aim is to expand the understanding of the developmental origins and key differences in the formation processes of each type of muscle tissue. Methods. A systematic scientific search was conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed databases. The analysis covered the period from 2015 to 2025. The search was performed using keywords such as "myogenesis," "cardiogenesis," "smooth muscle development," "muscle tissue histology," and "embryonic myogenesis." In total, over 100 scientific publications were analyzed, including review articles and the results of primary experimental studies. Results. The literature analysis confirms that the three types of muscle tissue have different origins and unique histogenetic mechanisms. Skeletal muscle develops from the myotomes of somites through the fusion of myoblasts into multinucleated muscle fibers. Cardiac muscle is formed from the visceral leaf of the splanchnotome; however, cardiomyocytes do not fuse but form a single network, functionally connected by intercalated discs. Smooth muscle has the most variable origin (from the splanchnotome mesenchyme or the ectoderm of the neural crest) and is formed from individual spindle-shaped cells that retain the ability to proliferate. Conclusion. The fundamental morphofunctional differences between the three types of muscle tissue are directly determined by their histogenesis. Modern research methods allow for the detailed study of these processes, confirming that the formation of multinucleated structures, specific intercellular contacts, and the variability of embryonic origin are key events that determine the final structure of muscle tissue. The systematization of this knowledge is the basis for further research in developmental biology and tissue engineering.

References

  1. Agarwal M, Sharma A, Kumar P, Kumar A, Bharadwaj A, Saini M, Kardon G, Mathew SJ. Myosin heavy chain-embryonic regulates skeletal muscle differentiation during mammalian development. Development. 2020;147(7):dev184507. doi: 10.1242/dev.184507.
  2. Giordani L, He GJ, Negroni E, Sakai H, Law JYC, Siu MM, Wan R, Corneau A, Tajbakhsh S, Cheung TH, Le Grand F. High-Dimensional Single-Cell Cartography Reveals Novel Skeletal Muscle-Resident Cell Populations. Mol Cell. 2019;74(3):609-21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.026.
  3. Wu P, Zhou K, Zhang J, Ling X, Zhang X, Zhang L, Li P, Wei Q, Zhang T, Wang X, Zhang G. Identification of crucial circRNAs in skeletal muscle during chicken embryonic development. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08588-4.
  4. Scaal M, Marcelle C. Chick muscle development. Int J Dev Biol. 2018;62(1-2-3):127-36. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.170312cm.
  5. Hernández-Hernández JM, García-González EG, Brun CE, Rudnicki MA. The myogenic regulatory factors, determinants of muscle development, cell identity and regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;72:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.010.
  6. Chal J, Pourquié O. Making muscle: skeletal myogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Development. 2017;144(12):2104-22. doi: 10.1242/dev.151035.
  7. Pourquié O. Somite formation in the chicken embryo. Int J Dev Biol. 2018;62(1-2-3):57-62. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.18003.
  8. Weldon SA, Münsterberg AE. Somite development and regionalisation of the vertebral axial skeleton. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;127:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.10.003.
  9. Bertrand S, Aldea D, Oulion S, Subirana L, de Lera AR, Somorjai I, Escriva H. Evolution of the Role of RA and FGF Signals in the Control of Somitogenesis in Chordates. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0136587.
  10. Miao Y, Pourquié O. Cellular and molecular control of vertebrate somitogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25(7):517-33. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00709-z.
  11. Onai T. The evolutionary origin of chordate segmentation: revisiting the enterocoel theory. Theory Biosci. 2018;137(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12064-018-0260-y.
  12. Piatkowska AM, Evans SE, Stern CD. Cellular aspects of somite formation in vertebrates. Cells Dev. 2021;168:203732. doi: 10.1016/j.cdev. 2021.203732.
  13. Meister L, Escriva H, Bertrand S. Functions of the FGF signalling pathway in cephalochordates provide insight into the evolution of the prechordal plate. Development. 2022;149(10):dev200252. doi: 10.1242/dev.200252.
  14. Miao Y, Djeffal Y, De Simone A, Zhu K, Lee JG, Lu Z, Silberfeld A, Rao J, Tarazona OA, Mongera A, Rigoni P, Diaz-Cuadros M, Song LMS, Di Talia S, Pourquié O. Reconstruction and deconstruction of human somitogenesis in vitro. Nature. 2023;614(7948):500-8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05655-4.
  15. Martin BL. Mesoderm induction and patterning: Insights from neuromesodermal progenitors. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;127:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.11.010.
  16. Criswell KE, Coates MI, Gillis JA. Embryonic origin of the gnathostome vertebral skeleton. Proc Biol Sci. 2017;284(1867):20172121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2121.
  17. Scaal M, Marcelle C. Chick muscle development. Int J Dev Biol. 2018;62(1-2-3):127-36. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.170312cm.
  18. Dong Y, Qian L, Liu J. Molecular and cellular basis of embryonic cardiac chamber maturation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021;118:144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.04.022.
  19. Dye B, Lincoln J. The Endocardium and Heart Valves. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020;12(12):a036723. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect. a036723.
  20. van der Maarel LE, Christoffels VM. Development of the Cardiac Conduction System. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1441:185-200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-44087-8_10.
  21. Pogontke C, Guadix JA, Ruiz-Villalba A, Pérez-Pomares JM. Development of the Myocardial Interstitium. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019;302(1):58-68. doi: 10.1002/ar.23915.
  22. Zhang M, Lui KO, Zhou B. Application of New Lineage Tracing Techniques in Cardiovascular Development and Physiology. Circ Res. 2024;134(4):445-58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.323179.
  23. Snabel RR, Cofiño-Fabrés C, Baltissen M, Schwach V, Passier R, Veenstra GJC. Cardiac differentiation roadmap for analysis of plasticity and balanced lineage commitment. Stem Cell Reports. 2025;20(3):102422. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2025. 102422.
  24. Ieda M. Heart Development, Diseases, and Regeneration – New Approaches From Innervation, Fibroblasts, and Reprogramming. Circ J. 2016;80(10):2081-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0815.
  25. Christoffels V, Jensen B. Cardiac Morphogenesis: Specification of the Four-Chambered Heart. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020;12(10): a037143. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a037143.
  26. Meilhac SM, Buckingham ME. The deployment of cell lineages that form the mammalian heart. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(11):705-24. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0086-9.
  27. Leone M, Magadum A, Engel FB. Cardiomyocyte proliferation in cardiac development and regeneration: a guide to methodologies and interpretations. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309(8):H1237-50. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart. 00559.2015.
  28. Gays D, Hess C, Camporeale A, Ala U, Provero P, Mosimann C, Santoro MM. An exclusive cellular and molecular network governs intestinal smooth muscle cell differentiation in vertebrates. Development. 2017;144(3):464-78. doi: 10.1242/ dev.133926.
  29. Donadon M, Santoro MM. The origin and mechanisms of smooth muscle cell development in vertebrates. Development. 2021;148(7):dev197384. doi: 10.1242/dev.197384.
  30. Liu M, Gomez D. Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Diversity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(9):1715-23. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA. 119.312131.
  31. Sur A, Wang Y, Capar P, Margolin G, Prochaska MK, Farrell JA. Single-cell analysis of shared signatures and transcriptional diversity during zebrafish development. Dev Cell. 2023;58(24):3028-47.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.11.001.
  32. Worssam MD, Jørgensen HF. Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle cell investment and phenotypic diversification in vascular diseases. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021;49(5):2101-2111. doi: 10.1042/ BST20210138.
  33. Jaslove JM, Nelson CM. Smooth muscle: a stiff sculptor of epithelial shapes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1759):20170318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0318.
  34. Hu Y, Cai Z, He B. Smooth Muscle Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Health and Aortic Aneurysmal Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11701. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411701.
  35. Steinbach SK, Husain M. Vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation from human stem/progenitor cells. Methods. 2016;101:85-92. doi: 10.1016/ j.ymeth.2015.12.004.
  36. Pierantozzi E, Vezzani B, Badin M, Curina C, Severi FM, Petraglia F, Randazzo D, Rossi D, Sorrentino V. Tissue-Specific Cultured Human Pericytes: Perivascular Cells from Smooth Muscle Tissue Have Restricted Mesodermal Differentiation Ability. Stem Cells Dev. 2016;25(9):674-86. doi: 10.1089/ scd.2015.0336.

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Kobeza, P., & Tverdokhlib , I. (2025). Histogenetic and morphofunctional aspects of muscle tissue classification (review and research perspectives). Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 19(4), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.4.95-103

Issue

Section

Статті