Bone support of the foot: anatomy and variability of the calcaneus

Authors

  • V.H. Hryn Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • O.O. Tikhonova Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • Ya.A. Tarasenko Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • V.P. Bilash Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • Yu.M. Severyn Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • V.P. Strizhenok Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine
  • O.V. Gorobets Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.2.82-87

Keywords:

calcaneus, subtalar joint, morphological variability

Abstract

Background. The key element of the musculoskeletal system in terms of load distribution, ensuring foot stability, and forming its arch is the calcaneus. Therefore, the study of the anatomical features of the calcaneus is important both for fundamental morphology and for clinical practice, podiatry and forensic medical examination. Objective is to analyze the anatomical, morphological and functional features of the calcaneus, its variability and clinical significance. Methods. An analytical review was used, which is based on foreign and domestic articles, books and monographs. For this purpose, the literature search was carried out on the Internet, scientific and metric databases. The search period was conducted until 2025. Results. The configuration of the articular surfaces of the calcaneus demonstrates significant anatomical variability, which has not been considered functionally important for a long time. Anatomically, the calcaneus consists of spongy tissue with a thin cortical shell. However, in certain areas, the cortical layer is significantly thickened. The calcaneus has well-developed vascularization. which provides growth and healing in injuries. Morphological variability of the articular surfaces can affect the biomechanics of the foot and has ethnic differences, which confirms its genetic determination. Conclusion. In conclusion, the calcaneus plays a crucial role in the biomechanics of the foot, providing stability to the subtalar joint, distributing weight, and adapting to mechanical loads. The structural features of the calcaneus make it key in supporting the foot's arch and performing motor functions. Surgical interventions must consider the specifics of its anatomy and vascular network to prevent ischemic complications. Radiological parameters are important diagnostic criteria for evaluating fractures and degenerative changes, and the presence of spurs often indicates pathological processes diagnostic criteria in the assessment of fractures and degenerative changes, and the presence of spurs often indicates pathological processes.

References

  1. Tsapenko VV, Tereshchenko MF. [Criteria for supporting characteristics of the human foot]. Visnyk KPI. Seriia Pryladobuduvannia. 2022;63(1):89–99. Ukrainian.
  2. Murerwa R, Amuti T, Muuthuri N, Wambui A, Ouko I, Ogeng'o J. Dorsal Morphology of the Calcaneus. Ann Afr Surg. 2020;17(3):112–5. doi: 10.4314/aas.v17i3.5
  3. Koh D, Tan B, Mehta K, et al. Morphometric Analysis of the Calcaneus in a Southeast Asian Population. Cureus [Internet]. April 24, 2024 [cited 2025 May 19]; 16(4): e58899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58899
  4. Jyotsna G, Mamidi A. The morphometric analysis of calcaneus and its articular facets. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol 2022;9(1):22-24.
  5. Kullar J, Arora A, Kapoor N, Randhawa G, Kullar K. Morphology of talar articular facets of calcaneus and its clinical implications. Kashmir J Med Sci 2015;1(1):10–4.
  6. Anbumani L, Sridharan R, Thamarai A. An anatomical study of morphology and morphometric analysis of calcaneum and its talar articular surfaces. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(3.2):4223-9. doi: 10.16965/ ijar.2017.291/
  7. Kumar A, Rastogi S, Haider Y, Kumar S, Chauhan S, Passey J. Morphometric variations of the lateral surface of calcaneus: Can standard plate sizes fit all? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov 20;13:156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.012.
  8. Hasko MV, Kovalchuk PIe, Tuliuliuk SV, Hasko DM. [Tactics of surgical treatment of patients with fractures of the fibular cyst]. Klinichna anatomiia ta operatyvna khirurhiia. 2020;19(1):109-12. Ukrainian. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ kaoch_2020_19_1_21.
  9. Patel S, Khan S. Techniques for Ideal Intraoperative Radiography of Calcaneum. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia Pacific) 2022;9(2):72-4.
  10. Gupton M, Özdemir M, Terreberry RR. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Calcaneus. [Updated 2023 May 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2025. https: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519544/
  11. Hall RL, Shereff MJ. Anatomy of the calcaneus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 May;(290):27-35. PMID: 8472459.
  12. Kachlik D, Baca V, Cepelik M, Hajek P, Mandys V, Musil V. Clinical anatomy of the calcaneal tuberosity. Ann Anat. 2008;190(3):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.02.001.
  13. Holovatskyi AS, Cherkasov VH, Sapin MR, Parakhin AI, Kovalchuk OI. [Human anatomy: textbook]. Vinnytsia : Nova Knyha; 2025. 368 p. Ukrainian. ISBN 966-382-022-5
  14. Dimichele D, Spradley M. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus. Forensic science international. 2021;152:e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.026
  15. Adserias-Garriga J, Feirstein S, Bell D, Skropits H, Dirkmaat DC. Human identification through forensic skeletal analysis: three case reviews. Forensic Sciences Research. 2024;9(3). doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae053
  16. Coelho, Catarina et al. The efficacy of calcanei to estimate ancestry. La Revue de Médecine Légale. 2017;8:189.
  17. Stephan D, Panzer S, Göttlinger M, Augat P. Analysis of the intra-individual differences of the joint surfaces of the calcaneus. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2013;17(15):1635–41. doi: 10.1080/ 10255842.2012.759564
  18. Bruckner J. Variations in the human subtalar joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987;8(10):489-94. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1987.8.10.489
  19. Sani G, Giabbani N, Zanna L, Buzzi R, Pio AS, Rastrelli V, Nardi C. The impact of sustentaculum tali fracture on clinical outcome in patients affected by isolated calcaneal fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(2):1017-24. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03760-2. PMC10858157.
  20. Olexa TA, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP. The sustentaculum tali: anatomic, radiographic, and surgical considerations. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(5):400-3. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100507.
  21. Mahato NK. Morphology of sustentaculum tali: Biomechanical importance and correlation with angular dimensions of the talus. Foot (Edinb). 2011;21(4):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2011.06.001.
  22. Harrison SH. Accident surgery-the life and times of William Gissane. Injury. 1984;16(3):145-54. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(84)90150-5.
  23. De Boer AS, Van Lieshout EMM, Vellekoop L, Den Hartog D, Kleinrensink GJ, Verhofstad MHJ. The Influence of Radiograph Obliquity on Böhler's and Gissane's Angles in Calcanei. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(1):44-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.02.004.
  24. Pombo B, Ferreira AC, Costa L. Bohler Angle and the Crucial Angle of Gissane in Paediatric Population. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;12:1179544119835227. doi: 10.1177/1179544119835227.
  25. Andermahr J, Helling HJ, Rehm KE, Koebke Z. The vascularization of the os calcaneum and the clinical consequences. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(363):212-8. PMID: 10379325.
  26. Donders JCE, Klinger CE, Shaffer AD, et al. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the Relative Arterial Contributions to the Calcaneus. Foot & Ankle International. 2018;39(5):604-12. doi: 10.1177/1071100717749229
  27. Hoduadze H, Pelypenko O, Malyk S, Honcharov A. [Use of minimally invasive methods for surgical treatment of intra-joint fractures of the calculus]. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny. 2023;23(1):8-12. Ukrainian. doi: 10.31718/2077-1096.23.1.8
  28. Amis J. The Split Second Effect: The Mechanism of How Equinus Can Damage the Human Foot and Ankle. Front Surg. 2016;3:38. doi: 10.3389/ fsurg.2016.00038.
  29. Raj MA, Tafti D, Kiel J. Pes Planus. Treasure Island (FL) : StatPearls Publishing; 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430802/
  30. Kirkpatrick J, Yassaie O, Mirjalili SA. The plantar calcaneal spur: a review of anatomy, histology, etiology and key associations. J Anat. 2017;230(6):743-51. doi: 10.1111/joa.12607.

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Hryn , V., Tikhonova , O., Tarasenko , Y., Bilash , V., Severyn , Y., Strizhenok , V., & Gorobets , O. (2025). Bone support of the foot: anatomy and variability of the calcaneus. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 19(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.2.82-87

Issue

Section

Статті