Ultrastructural and morphometric study of bone tissue regeneration dynamics using a combination of octacalcium phosphate with chitosan and ampicillin for osteoplasty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2022.4.51-59

Keywords:

mandible/lower jaw, dentoalveolar apparatus, bone tissue, bone regeneration, osteoplastic materials, сhitosan, morphometric study, scanning electron microscopy, rabbits.

Abstract

The relevance of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of bone tissue remodeling after the creation of a defect and subsequent filling with an osteoplastic material containing chitosan, a cationic linear polysaccharide. Despite the established clinical use of osteoplastic materials and the unique properties of chitosan, its impact on bone regeneration in the maxillofacial region, its mechanisms and dynamics, remain incompletely understood and require further clarification and detailed investigation. Aim. The aim of this study is to determine the dynamics of histoarchitectural remodeling of bone-ceramic regenerate following the transplantation of octacalcium phosphate in combination with chitosan and ampicillin into an experimental defect in the rabbit mandible. Methods.  Adult male rabbits aged 6-7 months and weighing 2.5-3 kg were used for the study. The control group consisted of animals with a bone defect that healed under a blood clot. The experimental group consisted of rabbits in which the bone defect was filled with an osteotropic material containing octacalcium phosphate, chitosan acetate, and ampicillin (OCР-N-Chitosan-Ampicillin). Post-traumatic bone tissue status within the defect area was monitored for 84 days. Ultrastructural changes were studied using scanning electron microscopy. To determine changes in the regenerate composition, three parameters were counted. The data was analyzed using the Student's t-test, and a difference at p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The OCР-N-Chitosan-Ampicillin material induced significant regenerative changes in the surface of the lower jaw experimental bone defect that occurred after the injury and correlated with the dynamics of changes in the relative volume of bone tissue, osteoplastic material, and connective tissue in the regenerate. Morphometric analysis of the relative volume of the regenerative components of the experimental defect established a phased nature of the dynamics of the studied changes. The osteocyte lacuno-canalicular system formed following implantation of the material exhibited characteristics of a typical structure. No foci of incomplete osteogenesis were observed. Compared to the control group, in the area of the external bone lamellae after application of the OCР -N-Chitosan-Ampicillin material, the osteons of the regenerate, in terms of structure and geometry, corresponded to the normal bone of the mandibular ramus. Conclusion. In the experimental group of animals where the defect was filled with OCР-N-Chitosan-Ampicillin material, an active increase in the relative volume of bone tissue in the regenerate was observed. This increase followed a similar dynamic trend as the control group, but it was significantly more intense and advanced than the control. 

References

  1. Xue N, Ding X, Huang R, Jiang R, Huang H, Pan X, et al. Bone tissue engineering in the treatment of bone defects. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15070879
  2. Valtanen, R. S., Yang, Y. P., Gurtner, G. C., Maloney, W. J., & Lowenberg, D. W. Synthetic and Bone tissue engineering graft substitutes: What is the future?. Injury. 2021;52 Suppl 2:S72-S77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.040
  3. Aguilar A, Zein N, Harmouch E, Hafdi B, Bornert F, Offner D, et al. Application of chitosan in bone and dental engineering. Molecules. 2019;24(16):3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24163009
  4. Dodero A, Scarfi S, Mirata S, Sionkowska A, Vicini S, Alloisio M, et al. Effect of crosslinking type on the physical-chemical properties and biocompatibility of chitosan-based electrospun membranes. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(5):831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050831
  5. Roffi A, Kon E, Perdisa F, Fini M, Di Martino A, Parrilli A, et al. A composite chitosan-reinforced scaffold fails to provide osteochondral regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092227
  6. Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Autologous bone grafting in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: an evidence-based narrative review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:4347. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194347
  7. Gillman CE, Jayasuriya AC. FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;130:112466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466
  8. Hamada S, Mori Y, Shiwaku Y, Hamai R, Tsuchiya K, Baba K, et al. Octacalcium phosphate/gelatin composite (OCP/Gel) enhances bone repair in a critical-sized transcortical femoral defect rat model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480:2043–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002257
  9. Jeong C-H, Kim J, Kim HS, Lim S-Y, Han D, Huser AJ, et al. Acceleration of bone formation by octacalcium phosphate composite in a rat tibia critical-sized defect. J Orthop Transl. 2022;37:100–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.007
  10. Maliki S, Sharma G, Kumar A, Moral-Zamorano M, Moradi O, Baselga J, et al. Chitosan as a tool for sustainable development: A mini review. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(7):1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071475
  11. Ke CL, Deng FS, Chuang CY, Lin CH. Antimicrobial actions and applications of chitosan. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(6):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060904
  12. Shah FA, Ruscsák K, Palmquist A. 50 years of scanning electron microscopy of bone – a comprehensive overview of the important discoveries made and insights gained into bone material properties in health, disease, and taphonomy. Bone Res. 2019;7:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-019-0053-z
  13. Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Michael JR, Ritchie NWM, Scott JHJ, Joy DC. Scanning electron microscopy and X-Ray microanalysis. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9
  14. Aescht E, Büchl-Zimmermann S, Burmester A, Dänhardt-Pfeiffer S, Desel C, Hamers C, et al. Romeis mikroskopische technik. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2254-5
  15. European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Strasburg: Council of Europe. 1986;123:52.
  16. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Off J Eur Union. 2010;53(L276):33–79.
  17. Paramita P, Ramachandran M, Narashiman S, et al. Sol-gel based synthesis and biological properties of zinc integrated nano bioglass ceramics for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06478-3
  18. Gómez-Barrena E, Padilla-Eguiluz N, Rosset P, Gebhard F, Hernigou P, Baldini N, et al. Early efficacy evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) combined to biomaterials to treat long bone non-unions. Injury. 2020;51(1):S63-S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.070
  19. Yan Y, Cheng B, Chen K, Cui W, Qi J, Li X, Deng L. Enhanced osteogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by a functionalized silk fibroin hydrogel for bone defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(3):e1801043. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801043
  20. Pandini FE, Kubo FMM, Plepis AMdG, Martins VdCA, da Cunha MR, Silva VR, et al. In vivo study of nasal bone reconstruction with collagen, elastin and chitosan membranes in abstainer and alcoholic rats. Polymers. 2022; 14(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010188
  21. Silva SK, Plepis AMG, Martins VDCA, Horn MM, Buchaim DV, Buchaim RL, et al. Suitability of chitosan scaffolds with carbon nanotubes for bone defects treated with photobiomodulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(12):6503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126503
  22. European Pharmacopoeia. 10th ed. Council of Europe, European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines Healthcare; Strasbourg, France: 2019.
  23. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention . The United States Pharmacopeia: The National Formulary. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention; Rockville, MD, USA: 2018.

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Chelpanova , I. (2022). Ultrastructural and morphometric study of bone tissue regeneration dynamics using a combination of octacalcium phosphate with chitosan and ampicillin for osteoplasty. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 16(4), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2022.4.51-59

Issue

Section

Статті