Morphometry. General method for histology, cytology and embryology. Overview and prospects of integration into the educational process

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2024.4.126-132

Keywords:

morphometry, histology, cytology, embryology, educational process.

Abstract

Background. Morphological analysis provides insights into the intricate architecture of cells and tissues, revealing how their specific configurations support their biological roles. The relevance of mastering morphometric techniques in modern scientific inquiry cannot be overstated. Objective. The primary aim of this article is to elucidate the significance of morphometry in the analysis of morphological structures within the framework of foundational courses in histology, cytology, and embryology. This analysis will emphasize its application in both normal physiology and pathological conditions, illustrating how morphometric data can inform clinical practice and research. Methods. Morphometry relies on precise measurements of the structural elements of tissues using light or electron microscopy, along with specialized software for image processing. Results. Described levels of organization and general approach to defining the morphofunctional unit. The structural-functional unit is a fundamental component of tissue, organs, or organ systems, characterized by a specific morphological organization that performs functions unique to that organ. This unit represents the minimal structural entity capable of independently executing biological processes inherent to a given organ or tissue, thereby sustaining vital activities across various levels of biological organization. Conclusion. In summary, the concept of structural-functional units is fundamental in histology, as it defines how tissues and organs are organized and function. The integration of morphometry with emerging technologies will undoubtedly pave the way for new insights into cellular behavior and disease mechanisms, reinforcing its pivotal role in the fields of medicine and biology.

References

  1. Weibel ER, Elias H. Introduction to stereology and morphometry. In: Quantitative Methods in Morphology/Quantitative Methoden in der Morphologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1967:3-19.
  2. Anderson RH, Brown NA. The anatomy of the heart revisited. Anat Rec. 1996;246(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199609)246:1<1::AID-AR1>3.0.CO;2-Y. PMID: 8876818
  3. Larkin S, Ansorge O, authors; Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors: Development And Microscopic Anatomy Of The Pituitary Gland. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2017.2000–. PMID: 28402619
  4. Dogan KK, author: Histology and Embryology 4.0. Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Times of Turbulence: Theoretical Background to Applications. IGI Global; 2024:119-134.
  5. Pawlina W, Drake RL. Anatomical models: don't banish them from the anatomy laboratory yet. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):209-210. doi: 10.1002/ase.1380. PMID: 23825081
  6. Trelease RB, Nieder GL. Transforming clinical imaging and 3D data for virtual reality learning objects: HTML5 and mobile devices implementation. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):263-270. doi: 10.1002/ase.1330. Epub 2012 Dec 4. PMID: 23212750
  7. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):216-224. doi: 10.1002/ase.1345. Epub 2013 Jan 24. PMID: 23349117
  8. Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):211-215. doi: 10.1002/ase.1355. Epub 2013 Mar 18. PMID: 23509000
  9. Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(2):98-108. doi: 10.1002/ase.1258. Epub 2012 Jan 9. PMID: 22232125
  10. Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(2):98-108. doi: 10.1002/ase.1258. Epub 2012 Jan 9. PMID: 22232125
  11. Trelease RB, Rosset A. Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(2):50-55. doi: 10.1002/ase.13. PMID: 19177381
  12. Hisley KC, Anderson LD, Smith SE, Kavic SM, Tracy JK. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(1):27-40. doi: 10.1002/ase.4. PMID: 19177376
  13. Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Su YK, Payer AF. Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(2):75-83. doi: 10.1002/ase.19. PMID: 19177385
  14. Amalinei C, Timofte AD, Căruntu ID, Wierzbicki PM, Żmijewski MA, Sirmakessis S, Girela JL, Martínez-Ruiz N, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Pérez-Cañaveras RM, Harizanova Z, Popova F, Colibaba C, Kmieć Z. Digital morphology network for effective teaching of cytology, histology and histopathology for medical and biology curriculum. VM3.0 Erasmus+ project. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2024;62(2):61-75. doi: 10.5603/fhc.100875. Epub 2024 Jun 24. PMID: 38912571
  15. Triola MM, Holloway WJ. Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-4. PMID: 21269474; PMCID: PMC3037351
  16. Megarani DV, et al. Comparative morphology and morphometry of blood cells in zebrafish (Danio rerio), common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio), and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 2020;59(6):673-680.
  17. Neel JA, Grindem CB, Bristol DG. Introduction and evaluation of virtual microscopy in teaching veterinary cytopathology. J Vet Med Educ. 2007;34(4):437-444. doi: 10.3138/jvme.34.4.437. PMID: 18287470
  18. Dee FR, Meyerholz DK. Teaching medical pathology in the twenty-first century: virtual microscopy applications. J Vet Med Educ. 2007;34(4):431-436. doi: 10.3138/jvme.34.4.431. PMID: 18287469
  19. Heidger PM Jr, Dee F, Consoer D, Leaven T, Duncan J, Kreiter C. Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging. Anat Rec. 2002;269(2):107-112. doi: 10.1002/ar.10078. PMID: 12001217
  20. Dehaan RL, Ebert JD. Morphogenesis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1964;26:15-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.26.030164.000311. PMID: 14147456
  21. O'Rourke J, Bode G, authors; Mobley HLT, Mendz GL, Hazell SL, editors: Morphology and Ultrastructure. Helicobacter pylori: Physiology and Genetics. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2001. Chapter 6. PMID: 21290748
  22. Duerr JS. Immunohistochemistry. WormBook; 2006:1-61. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.105.1. PMID: 18050446; PMCID: PMC4780882
  23. Weibel ER, author: "Morphometry: stereological theory and practical methods."Models of lung disease. CRC Press; 2020:199-252.
  24. Khan RH, Rhodes JS, Girard IA, Schwartz NE, Garland Jr T. Does Behavior Evolve First? Correlated Responses to Selection for Voluntary Wheel-Running Behavior in House Mice. Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology. 2024;97(2):97-117.
  25. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11(6):805-821. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582. PMID: 10860804
  26. Goto M, Abe O, Aoki S, Kamagata K, Hori M, Miyati T, Gomi T, Takeda T. Combining Segmented Grey and White Matter Images Improves Voxel-based Morphometry for the Case of Dilated Lateral Ventricles. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2018;17(4):293-300. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0127. Epub 2018 Jan 18. PMID: 29343657; PMCID: PMC6196303
  27. Diagone KV, Vicente WR, Pacheco MR, Mateus O. Oocyte morphometry in female dogs (Canis familiaris, Linnaeus, 1758). Anat Histol Embryol. 2008;37(2):81-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2007.00801.x. PMID: 18333852
  28. Chou SH, Vokes T. Vertebral Morphometry. J Clin Densitom. 2016;19(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 6. PMID: 26349790
  29. Sanfélix-Genovés J, Arana E, Sanfélix-Gimeno G, Peiró S, Graells-Ferrer M, Vega-Martínez M. Agreement between semi-automatic radiographic morphometry and Genant semi-quantitative method in the assessment of vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(8):2129-2134. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1819-3. Epub 2011 Dec 15. PMID: 22170523
  30. Gómez-Torres FA, Sebastian R, Ruíz-Sauri A. Morphometry and comparative histology of sinus and atrioventricular nodes in humans and pigs and their relevance in the prevention of nodal arrhythmias. Res Vet Sci. 2020;128:275-285. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 5. PMID: 31869593

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Kobeza, P. (2025). Morphometry. General method for histology, cytology and embryology. Overview and prospects of integration into the educational process. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 18(4), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2024.4.126-132

Issue

Section

Статті