Comparative morphological characteristics of the skin condition in patients with climacteric keratoderma

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.1.57-66

Keywords:

climacteric keratoderma, skin, morphology, epidermis, dermis, microcirculation, morphometry.

Abstract

Background. Modern data on structural transformations of the epidermis and dermis indicate significant changes in the composition of the skin in patients with climacteric keratoderma, however, problematic issues of pathomorphogenesis of damage to the epithelial, microvascular and connective tissue components of the skin remain unsolved and require a substantiated solution. The aim of this study was to determine the morphological changes of the epithelial, connective tissue and microcirculatory components of the skin in patients with climacteric keratoderma. Methods. Using light-optical and transmission electron microscopy, a study of the skin condition of the foot and gluteal region in women of three groups was conducted. The first group (control) consisted of women aged 21 to 40 years without manifestations of menopause, keratoderma and other dermatological diseases. The second group (comparison group) included patients aged 50 to 65 years in the climacteric period without clinical signs of keratoderma. The third clinical group consisted of patients aged 50 to 68 years, who were diagnosed climacteric keratoderma with a disease duration of 4 to 21 years. Results and conclusion. The morphological analysis performed using modern research methods allowed us to identify a number of systemic and local structural changes in the skin, which characterize the restructuring of epithelial and extraepithelial cells of the epidermis, as well as microvascular and connective tissue components of the dermis in patients with climacteric keratoderma. It has been proven that under conditions of estrogen deficiency, the hyperkeratosis process in patients of this group is not associated with the proliferative activity of keratinocytes, but depends on local changes in the morpho-functional state of epidermal cells of monocytic origin (Langerhans cells), fibroblasts of the papillary layer of the dermis and their reaction to microcirculation damage.

References

  1. Pierard-Franchimont C. Climacteric skin ageing of the face – a prospective longitudinal comparative trial on theeflfect of oral hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1999;32:87-93.
  2. Has C, Technau-Hafsi K. Palmoplantar keratodermas, clinical and genetic aspects. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;149(2):3-142.
  3. Lovgren ML, McAleer MA, Irvine AD, Wilson NJ, Tavadia S, Schwartz ME, Cole C, Sandilands A, Smith F, Zamiri M. Mutations in desmoglein1 cause diverse inherited palmoplantar keratoderma phenotypes: implications for genetic screening. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(5):1345-50.
  4. Enta T. Keratoderma climactericum. Can. Fam. Physician. 1996;42:629-31.
  5. Itin PH, Fistarol SK. Palmoplantar keratodermas. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(1):15-22.
  6. Bergman R, Hershkovitz D, Fuchs D, Indelman M, Gadot Y, Sprecher E. Disadhesion of epidermal keratinocytes: a histologic clue to palmoplantar keratodermas caused by DSG1 mutations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(1):107-13.
  7. Deschamps P, Leroy D, Pedailles S, Mandard JC. Keratoderma climactericum (Haxthausen's disease): clinical signs, laboratory findings and etretinate treatment in 10 patients. Dermatologica. 1986;172(5):258-62.
  8. Raone B, Raboni R, Patrizi A. Alitretinoin: a new treatment option for hereditary punctate palmoplantar keratoderma (Brauer-Buschke-Fischer syndrome). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):48-9.
  9. Kubo A, Oura Y, Hirano T, Aoyama Y, Sato S, Nakamura K. Collapse of the keratin filament network through the expression of mutant keratin 6c observed in a case of focal plantar keratoderma. J Dermatol. 2013;40(7):553-7.
  10. Buka GYu, Dasyuk TYe, Dasyuk IJ, Tverdokhlib IV. [Quantitative morphological assessment of the temporal region skin in different age categories of women with additional internal pathology]. Morphologia. 2024;18(4):22-31. Ukrainian.
  11. Tverdokhlib IV, Makarchuk OI. [Morphological characteristics of temporal area skin in patients with an additional pathology on age aspect]. Morphologia. 2015;9(3):83-8. Ukrainian.
  12. Makarchuk OI, Silkina YuV, Tverdokhlib IV. [Morphological analysis of temporal area skin in patients with an additional pathology on age aspect]. Morphologia. 2020;14(4):35-41. Ukrainian.
  13. Sakiyama T, Kubo A. Hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma “clinical and genetic differential diagnosis”. J Dermatol. 2016;43(3):264-74.
  14. Guerra L, Castori M, Didona B, Castiglia D, Zambruno G. Hereditary palmoplantar keratodermas. Part I. Non-syndromic palmoplantar keratodermas: classification, clinical and genetic features. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2018;32(5):704-19.
  15. Irisawa R, Yamazaki M, Yamamoto T, Tsuboi R. A case of porokeratosis plantaris palmaris et disseminata and literature review. Dermatol Online J. 2012;18(8):5-15.
  16. Akbar A, Prince C, Payne C, Fasham J, Ahmad W, Baple EL, Crosby AH, Harlalka GV, Gul A. Novel nonsense variants in SLURP1 and DSG1 cause palmoplantar keratoderma in Pakistani families. Med Genet. 2019;20(1):145-52.
  17. Mulish M, Welsh U. (Eds.). Romeis Mikroscopiche technic. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2010. 551 p. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-8274-2254-5
  18. Suvarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft GD. (Eds.). Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 8th Edition. Elsevier; 2019. 558 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-6864-5.00008-6
  19. Collins TJ. ImageJ for microscopy. BioTechniques. 2007;43:25-30.
  20. Poslavska OV. [Determination of linear dimensions and square surfaces areas of morphological objects on micrographs using ImageJ software]. Morphologia. 2016;10(3):377-81. Ukrainian.
  21. Méndez-Vilas A, Rigoglio NN, Mendes Silva MV. Current microscopy contributions to advances in science and technology. Badajoz : Formatex, 2012. 1523 p.
  22. Hayat МА. Principles and techniques of electron microscopy: Biological applications [4th ed.]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 2000. 543 p.
  23. Kuo J. Electron microscopy: methods and protocols. Totowa, New Jersey : Humana Press Inc; 2007. 608 p.
  24. Hruzieva TS, Lekhan VM, Ohniev VA, Haliienko LI, Kriachkova LV, Palamar BI, et al. [Biostatistics]. Vinnytsia : New Book; 2020. 384 p. Ukrainian.

Published

2025-04-08

How to Cite

Synakh , O. (2025). Comparative morphological characteristics of the skin condition in patients with climacteric keratoderma. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 19(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2025.1.57-66

Issue

Section

Статті