The peculiarities of practical classes structure during the distance learning on morphology orientated departments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.220-226

Keywords:

distance learning, testing, practical skills, pathomorphology

Abstract

Background. Nowadays distance learning is a necessary measure under pandemic circumstances, therefore, it is important to find out mechanisms to improve its effectiveness. Objective is to increase the efficiency of practical classes’ results during distance learning. Methods. Sixty third course international EAs (specialty "222 Medicine", second master's level) were divided into two equal groups with two different teaching approaches of practical classes: control with classical one (material discussion followed by the practical skills implementation) and experimental with a changed indicated stages order. The data of 3 controls (pretest, intermediate test and posttest) during practical classes in the course of one semester were analyzed by criteria for non-normal distribution. Results. Pretest and posttest results were not significantly different in both tested and control groups within different performing level EAs (p>0.05). The data of intermediate tests were familiar in groups of EAs who permanently have either average (p>0.05) or insufficient grades (p>0.05), but increased in groups of EAs with constant low (p≤0,05) and high (p<0,05) scores. Conclusion. Our study showed that academic performance did not heavily depend on performed practical classes’ structure. However, the critical discussion of low- and high-performing EAs' mistakes lead to improvement of their understanding of nuances of gross specimen and slide description, in other words, the implementation of a number of special and general competencies enhancement. All in all, data showd that exit control results as well as final grades depended not so much on the educational approach, but on the EAs' self-study.

References

  1. Kovalchuk OI, Bondarenko MP, Okhrey AG, Prybytko IY, Reshetnyak EM. [Features of using immersive technologies (virtual and augmented reality) in medical education and practice]. Morphologia. 2020;14(3):158-164. Ukrainian. DOI:10.26641/1997-9665.2020.3.158-164
  2. Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N, Ehlers JP, Sostmann K, Peters H. Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students' usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:267-273.
  3. DOI:10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5. PMCID: 27544782; PMID: PMC5018353.
  4. Valentini J, Glassen K, Eicher C, Washington-Dorando P, Weinschenk S, Musselmann B, Steinhäuser J, Joos S. ["Critical discussion should be encouraged!" - a qualitative analysis of medical students' evaluation of a complementary medicine course]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018;143(14):125-130. German. DOI:10.1055/a-0575-6851. PMID: 30005431.
  5. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H, Aborajooh EA, Al-Taher R, Al-Balas B. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):341. DOI:10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4.
  6. Schneider SL, Council ML. Distance learning in the era of COVID-19. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021;313(5):389-390. DOI:10.1007/s00403-020-02088-9. PMID: 32385691; PMCID: PMC7209972.
  7. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical EAs. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e042378. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378. PMID: 33154063; PMCID: PMC7646323.
  8. Tsur AM, Ziv A, Amital H. Distance Learning in the Field of Medicine: Hope or Hype? Isr Med Assoc J. 2021;23(7):447-448. PMID: 34251129.
  9. Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, Appel J. Telemedicine and Medical Education in the Age of COVID-19. Acad Med. 2020;95(12):1838-1843. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003711. PMID: 32889946; PMCID: PMC7489227.
  10. Zairi I, Mzoughi K, Ben Dhiab M, Soussi S, Kraiem S. Evaluation of clinical reasoning teaching for third year medical students. Tunis Med. 2017;95(1):1-5. PMID: 29327761.
  11. 222 - Medicine [Internet]. Google Drive. Google; [cited 2021 Sep 2]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Z0tJ6U5IliSyPawibLph7zPGUDoG9R5W
  12. Dimitrov DM, Rumrill PD Jr. Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work. 2003;20(2):159-165. PMID: 12671209.
  13. Farahmand S, Jalili E, Arbab M, Sedaghat M, Shirazi M, Keshmiri F, Azizpour A, Valadkhani S, Bagheri-Hariri S. Distance Learning Can Be as Effective as Traditional Learning for Medical Students in the Initial Assessment of Trauma Patients. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54(9):600-604. PMID: 27832693.
  14. Keller AS, Davidesco I, Tanner KD. Attention Matters: How Orchestrating Attention May Relate to Classroom Learning. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020;19(3):5. DOI:10.1187/cbe.20-05-0106. PMID: 32870089.
  15. Hunukumbure AD, Horner PJ, Fox J, Thakerar V. An online discussion between students and teachers: a way forward for meaningful teacher feedback? BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):289. DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02730-8. PMID: 34020631; PMCID: PMC8139045.

Published

2021-12-25

How to Cite

The peculiarities of practical classes structure during the distance learning on morphology orientated departments. (2021). Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 15(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.220-226

Issue

Section

Статті