Fractal analysis of images in medicine and morphology: basic principles and methodologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.196-206

Keywords:

fractal analysis, fractal dimension, morphometry, image segmentation

Abstract

Background. Fractal analysis is an informative and objective method of mathematical analysis that can complement existing methods of morphometry and provides a comprehensive quantitative assessment of the spatial configuration of irregular anatomical structures. Objective: a comparative analysis of fractal analysis methods used for morphometry in biomedical research. Methods. A comprehensive analysis of morphological studies, based on fractal analysis. Results. Different types of medical images with different preprocessing algorithms can be used for fractal analysis. The parameter determined by fractal analysis is the fractal dimension, which is a measure of the complexity of the spatial configuration and the degree of filling of space with a certain geometric object. The most known methods of fractal analysis are the following: box counting, caliper, pixel dilation, "mass-radius", cumulative intersection, grid intercept. The box counting method and its modifications is the most commonly used method due to the simplicity and versatility. Different methods of fractal analysis have a similar principle: fractal measures (different geometric figures) of a certain size completely cover the structure in the image, size of fractal measure is iteratively changed, and the minimum number of fractal measures covering the structure is calculated. Methods of fractal analysis differ in the type of fractal measure, which can be a linear segment, a square of a fractal grid, a cube, a circle, a sphere etc. Conclusion. The choice of the method of fractal analysis and image preprocessing method depends on the studied structure, features of its spatial configuration, the type of image used for the analysis, and the aim of the study.

References

  1. Mandelbrot BB. Les Objets fractals: forme, hasard et dimension. Paris: Flammarion; 1975. 214 p.
  2. Mandelbrot BB. Fractals – form, chance and dimension. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1977. 365 p.
  3. Mandelbrot BB. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1982. 470 p.
  4. Jelinek HF, Fernandez E. Neurons and fractals: how reliable and useful are calculations of fractal dimensions? J Neurosci Methods. 1998;81(1-2):9-18.
  5. Akar E, Kara S, Akdemir H, Kiris A. Fractal analysis of MR images in patients with Chiari malformation: The importance of preprocessing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2017;31:63-70.
  6. Akar E, Kara S, Akdemir H, Kırış A. Fractal dimension analysis of cerebellum in Chiari Malformation type I. Comput Biol Med. 2015;64:179-186.
  7. Akar E, Kara S, Akdemir H, Kırış A. 3D structural complexity analysis of cerebellum in Chiari malformation type I. Medical & biological engineering & computing. 2017;55(12):2169–2182.
  8. King RD, George AT, Jeon T. Characterization of Atrophic Changes in the Cerebral Cortex Using Fractal Dimensional Analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2009;3(2):154-166. DOI:10.1007/s11682-008-9057-9
  9. King RD, Brown B, Hwang M, Jeon T, George AT; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Fractal dimension analysis of the cortical ribbon in mild Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2010;53(2):471-479.
  10. Wu YT, Shyu KK, Jao CW. Fractal dimension analysis for quantifying cerebellar morphological change of multiple system atrophy of the cerebellar type (MSA-C). Neuroimage. 2010;49(1):539-551.
  11. Liu JZ, Zhang LD, Yue GH. Fractal dimension in human cerebellum measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Biophys J. 2003;85(6):4041-4046.
  12. Di Ieva A, Grizzi F, Jelinek H, Pellionisz AJ, Losa GA. Fractals in the Neurosciences, Part I: General Principles and Basic Neurosciences. Neuroscientist. 2014;20(4):403-417.
  13. Di Ieva A, Esteban FJ, Grizzi F, Klonowski W, Martín-Landrove M. Fractals in the neurosciences, Part II: clinical applications and future perspectives. Neuroscientist. 2015;21(1):30-43.
  14. Zaletel I, Ristanović D, Stefanović BD, Puškaš N. Modified Richardson's method versus the box-counting method in neuroscience. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;242:93-96. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.013
  15. Stepanenko AY. [Asymmetry of the structure of the superficial vascular bed of the human cerebellum]. Morphologia. 2017;11(2):46-51. Russian.
  16. Stepanenko AY, Maryenko NI. [Fractal analysis as a method of morphometric study of the superficial vascular network of human cerebellum]. Medytsyna syohodni i zavtra. 2015;4(69):50–55. Russian.
  17. Stepanenko AY, Maryenko NI. [Fractal analysis as a method of morphometric study of the human cerebellum white matter]. World of Medicine and Biology. 2016;4(58):127–130. Russian.
  18. Stepanenko AY, Maryenko NI. [Fractal analysis of the human cerebellum white matter]. World of Medicine and Biology. 2017;3(61):145–149. Russian.
  19. Fernández E, Jelinek HF. Use of fractal theory in neuroscience: methods, advantages, and potential problems. Methods. 2001;24(4):309-321. DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1201
  20. Hastings H. Fractal geometry in biological systems: An analytical approach edited by Phillip M. Iannacone and Mustafa Khokha. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 1997;59(4):791–794.
  21. Bourke P. Fractal dimension calculator user manual. Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology Web; 1993. 9 p.
  22. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9(7);671–675.
  23. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9(7):676–682.
  24. Torre IG, Heck RJ, Tarquis AM. MULTIFRAC: An ImageJ plugin for multiscale characterization of 2D and 3D stack images. SoftwareX. 2020;12:100574.
  25. Ampilova NB, Soloviev IP. [Algorithms of fractal analysis of images]. Komp'juternye instrumenty v obrazovanii. 2012;2:19-24. Russian.
  26. Feder J. Fractals. New York: Plenum Press; 1988. 284 p.
  27. Stoa R. The Coastline Paradox. Rutgers University Law Review. 2020;72(2):351-400. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3445756
  28. Mandelbrot B. How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension. Science, New Series. 1967;3775(156):636-638.
  29. Maryenko N, Stepanenko O. Fractal dimension of external linear contour of human cerebellum (magnetic resonance imaging study). Reports of Morphology. 2021;27(2):16-2.
  30. Fernandez E, Eldred WD, Ammermuller J, Block A, von Bloh W, Kolb H. Complexity and scaling properties of amacrine, ganglion, horizontal and bipolar cells in the turtle retina. J Comp Neurol. 1994;347:397–408.
  31. Morigiwa K, Tauci M, Fukuda Y. Fractal analysis of ganglion cell dendritic branching patterns of the rat and cat retinae. Neurosci Res. 1989;10:131-140.
  32. Kolb H, Fernandez E, Schouten J, Ahnelt P, Linberg KA, Fisher SK. Are there three types of horizontal cells in the human retina? J Comp Neurol. 1994;343:370–386.
  33. Dovgyallo YV, Velma KM, Gorbacheva EA. [Age variability of the fractal index of the surface arterial network of the large hemispheres depending on the value of the external diameter of the internal carotid arteries]. Universitetskaja klinika. 2021;2(39):36-43. Russian.
  34. Smith TG Jr, Behar TN, Lange GD, Sheriff WH Jr, Neale EA. A fractal analysis of cell images. J Neurosci Methods. 1989;27:173–180.
  35. Caserta F, Eldred WD, Fernandez E, Hausman RE, Stanford LR, Bulderev SV, Schwarzer S, Stanley HE. Determination of physiologically characterized neurons in two and three dimensions. J Neurosci Methods. 1995;56:133–144.
  36. Tatsumi J, Yamauchi A, Kono Y. Fractal analysis of plant root systems. Ann. Bot. 1989;64:499–503.
  37. Berntson G. Root Systems and Fractals: How Reliable are Calculations of Fractal Dimensions? Annals of Botany. 1994;73(3):281-284.
  38. Berntson GM, Lynch JP, Snapp S. Fractal geometry and plant root systems: current perspectives and future applications. New York: Lewis Publishers; 1997. 152 p.
  39. Smith TG Jr, Brauer K, Reichenbach A. Quantitative phylogenetic constancy of cerebellar Purkinje cell morphological complexity. J Comp Neurol. 1993;331:402-406.
  40. Jelinek HF. The use of fractal analysis in cat retinal ganglion cell classification. Sydney: The University of Sydney; 1996. 242 p.
  41. Falconer KJ. The Geometry of Fractal Sets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986. 162 p.
  42. Schroeder M. Fractals, Chaos and Power Laws: Minutes from an Infinite Paradise. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1991. 431 p.
  43. Maryenko NI, Stepanenko OY. [Fractal analysis as a morphometric method in morphology: a pixel dilatation technique in the study of digital images of anatomical structures]. Medytsyna syohodni i zavtra. 2019;1(82):8-15. Ukrainian.
  44. Maryenko NI, Stepanenko OY. [Fractal analysis of human cerebellum based on magnetic resonance imaging data: pixel dilating method]. Morphologia. 2020;14(3):52-58. Ukrainian.
  45. Maryenko N, Stepanenko O. Fractal dimension of phylogenetically different parts of the human cerebellum (magnetic resonance imaging study). Reports of Morphology. 2020;26(2):67-73.
  46. Takayasu H. Fractals in the Physical Sciences. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1989. 170 p.
  47. Schierwagen A. Scale-invariant diffusive growth: a dissipative principle relating neuronal form to function. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1990. 189 p.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-25

How to Cite

Fractal analysis of images in medicine and morphology: basic principles and methodologies. (2021). Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 15(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.196-206

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Статті

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the Journal the right to the first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which allows other people to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
        By submitting a manuscript to the editorial office of the Journal ‘Morphologia’ authors agree to transfer the rights to protect and use the manuscript (all supplemental materials, particularly protected objects such as photos, drawings, diagrams, tables, etc.), including the reproduction in the press and distribution via the Internet; translation of the manuscript into any language; export and import of journal copies with the Authors’ article in order to make it available for public. Authors convey the rights mentioned above to the editorial office without any temporal or territorial limitation all over the world. 
        The Authors guarantee that they have the exclusive rights to use the material transferred to editorial office. Editors are not responsible to third parties for contraventions of warranty given by the Authors. The considered rights are transferred to the editorial office since the moment when the current issue is signed for publishing. Reproduction of materials published in the Journal by other individuals and legal entities is possible only with the consent of Editorial office, with the obligatory indication of the full bibliographic reference of the primary publication. The Authors reserve the right to use the published material, its fragments and parts for teaching materials, oral presentations, dissertation thesis prepararion with obligatory bibliographic citation of the original paper. Electron copy of the published article, downloaded from official journal web-site in .pdf format may be put by authors on the official web-site of their institutions, any other official resources with open access.