Morphological features of invasion of tumor cells of invasive ductal breast cancer

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.119-124

Keywords:

invasive ductal breast cancer, invasion of tumor cells, solid, alveolar, tubular, trabecular, discrete structures, parenchymal-stromal relationships, desmoplasia

Abstract

Background. Nowadays, it has been proven that along with the invasion of individual tumor cells, their group migration occurs in the invasive front of the tumor, and this is an important factor in tumor progression. Objective: to determine the features of tumor cell invasion in the invasive front (IF) of invasive ductal breast cancer (BCa) without special specific features (IC NST) and to establish associative links between them and the clinical and pathological characteristics of the disease. Methods. The study was performed on BCa samples (after hematoxylin and eosin stained) from 120 patients with invasive ductal BCa I-II stage with G2 grade of tumor differentiation that didn’t receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results. Tumors were divided into 3 groups: with predominance of parenchymal component (PC), with the larger component of connective tissue, and relatively equivalent ratio of these components. Within the IF of the studied tumors of patients with ІІ stage of the tumor process, group invasion of tumor structures was mainly determined, both separately and in combination. In particular, an increase in solid structures in tumors with a predominance of the PC, and in neoplasms with expressed desmoplastic changes in connective tissue and their advantage, - alveolar, tubular, discrete. Conclusion. In tumors of patients with invasive ductal BCa in the invasive front is dominated by collective migration of tumor cells, which is the starting mechanism of tumor progression and the first step of the metastatic process. Defined associative links between the features of tumor cell invasion and the clinical and pathological characteristics of the tumor process in BCa patients can be used in predicting this form of cancer.

References

  1. Jiang WG, Sanders AJ, Katoh M, Ungefroren H, Gieseler F, Prince M, Thompson SK, Zollo M, Spano D, Dhawan P, Sliva D, Subbarayan PR, Sarkar M, Honoki K, Fujii H, Georgakilas AG, Amedei A, Niccolai E, Amin A, Ashraf SS, Ye L, Helferich WG, Yang X, Boosani CS, Guha G, Ciriolo MR, Aquilano K, Chen S, Azmi AS, Keith WN, Bilsland A, Bhakta D, Halicka D, Nowsheen S, Pantano F, Santini D. Tissue invasion and metastasis: Molecular, biological and clinical perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35:244-275. DOI:10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.008.
  2. Lintz M, Muñoz A, Reinhart-King CA. The mechanics of single cell and collective migration of tumor cells. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139(2):210051–210059. DOI:10.1115/1.4035121
  3. Gerashchenko TS, Novikov NM, Krakhmal NV, Zolotaryova SY, Zavyalova MV, Cherdyntseva NV, Denisov EV, Perelmuter VM. [Markers of Cancer Cell Invasion: Are They Good Enough]. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1092. Russian. DOI:10.3390/jcm8081092.
  4. Shimizu S, Miyazaki A, Sonoda T, Koike K, Ogi K, Kobayashi J-I, Kaneko T, Igarashi T, Ueda M, Dehari H, Miyakawa A, Hasegawa T, Hiratsuka H. Tumor budding is an independent prognostic marker in early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: With special reference to the mode of invasion and worst pattern of invasion. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195451. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195451.
  5. Lino-Silva LS, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Gamboa-Domínguez A. Tumour budding in rectal cancer. A comprehensive review. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):61–74. DOI:10.5114/wo.2018.77043.
  6. Yavuz BG, Pestana RC, Abugabal YI, Krishnan S, Chen J, Hassan MM, Wolff RA, Rashid A, Amin AM, Kaseb AO. Origin and role of hepatic myofibroblasts in hepatocellular carcinoma Oncotarget. 2020;11:1186-1201. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27532.
  7. Attieh Y, Clark AG, Grass C, Richon S, Pocard M, Mariani P, Elkhatib N, Betz T, Gurchenkov B, Vignjevic DM. Cancer-associated fibroblasts lead tumor invasion through integrin-beta3-dependent fibronectin assembly. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(11):3509-3520. DOI:10.1083/jcb.201702033.1–12.
  8. Lo A, Wang L-CS, Scholler J, Monslow J, Avery D, Newick K, O'Brien S, Evans RA, Bajor DJ, Clendenin C, Durham AC, Buza EL, Vonderheide RH, June CH, Albelda SM and Puré E. Tumor-promoting Desmoplasia is disrupted by depleting FAP-expressing stromal cells. Cancer Res. 2018;5(14):2800–2810. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3041.
  9. Karagiannis GS, Poutahidis T, Erdman SE, Kirsch R, Riddell RH, Diamandis EP. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Drive the Progression of Metastasis through both Paracrine and Mechanical Pressureon Cancer Tissue. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10(11):1403–1418.
  10. Najgebauer H, Liloglou T, Jithesh PV, Giger OT, Varro A, Sanderson CM. Integrated omics profiling reveals novel patterns of epigenetic programming in cancer-associated myofibroblasts. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40(4):500–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgz001.
  11. Denisov EV, Gerashchenko TS, Tashireva LA, Pautova DN, Zavyalova MV, Cherdyntseva NV, Perelmuter VM. [The significance of intratumor morphological heterogeneity in breast cancer progression and pathogenetic mechanisms]. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(9):153–155. Russian.
  12. Krakhmal NV, Zavyalova MV, Denisov EV, Vtorushin SV, Perelmuter VM. [Cancer invasion: patterns and mechanisms]. Acta Naturae. 2015;7(2):17–28. Russian.
  13. Sanegre S, Eritja N, de Andrea C, Diaz-Martin J, Diaz-Lagares Á, Jácome MA, Salguero-Aranda C, Ros DG, Davidson B, Lopez R, Melero I, Navarro S, Caja SR, de Alava E. Characterizing the Invasive Tumor Front of Aggressive Uterine Adenocarcinoma and Leiomyosarcoma. Front. Cell Dev. 2021;9:5.

Published

2021-12-25

How to Cite

Morphological features of invasion of tumor cells of invasive ductal breast cancer. (2021). Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 15(3), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.119-124

Issue

Section

Статті