Features of the anatomical structure of the cecum and the appendix in a comparative aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.9-16

Keywords:

cecum, white rats, appendix, gastrointestinal tract

Abstract

Background. Comparison of the structure of organs in humans and some animals in connection with their functions makes it possible to understand adaptations to the conditions of existence of living organisms as integral systems, as well as the origin and paths of their evolution. The legitimacy of the experimental modeling of a particular pathological process in laboratory conditions is achieved, as is known, by preliminary establishing a sufficient degree of homology between the corresponding functional systems of a human and an experimental animal. Objective. To study the features of the anatomical structure of the cecum and the appendix in a comparative aspect by means of a bibliographic analysis of the literature. Methods. Bibliographic analysis is based on published peer-reviewed articles, books, textbooks, monographs, dissertation abstracts. For the purposes of this systematic review, the literature search (concerning the study of the anatomical structure of the large intestine and the appendix in a comparative aspect) was carried out on the Internet, domestic literature sources, scientific and electronic libraries of Poltava State Medical University. The search period covered the period from 2011 to 2021, but the review includes some data from earlier publications, since these literary sources have significant scientific value. Results. The cecum is a shallow reservoir located below the confluence of the distal ileum into the colon. The most noteworthy, in terms of research, is the initial section of the large intestine – the cecum, which in the rat does not have a domed shape, as in humans, but a funnel-shaped extended downwards with the presence of a large basal part (the base of the cecum) and a pointed apex. An important feature of the cecum is the presence of a special appendage – the appendage, which is absent in rats. Conclusion. In general terms of the anatomical organization, the digestive system of the white rat is similar to that of a human. Only their dimensional characteristics are incomparable; however, this is a positive feature in experimental studies compared to other larger laboratory animals. In rats, the cecum, in commensurate comparison with other parts of the gastrointestinal tract, is a more developed formation than in humans, which is apparently dictated by the large proportion of foods containing fiber in their diet. The cecum of the rat does not have a vermiform appendix as such, which in humans is a noticeable formation, a lymphoepithelial organ.

References

  1. Kostylenko YP. Anatomiya organov pishchevaritel'noy sistemy: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov stomatologicheskikh fakul'tetov meditsinskikh VUZov [Anatomy of the digestive system: a textbook for students of dental faculties of medical universities]. Poltava: eaPSMU; 2003. 123 p. Russian.
  2. Hryn VH, Kostylenko YP, Brovarnyk YO. [Some features of the anatomical structure of the large intestine of white rats]. Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine. 2018;4,2(147):265-270. Russian. DOI 10.29254/2077-4214-2018-4-2-147-265-270
  3. Karkishchenko NN, Gracheva SV, redaktory. Rukovodstvo po laboratornym zhivotnym i al'ternativnym modelyam v biomeditsinskikh issledovaniyakh [Guidance on laboratory animals and alternative models in biomedical research]. Moskva: Profil'-2S; 2010. 358 p. Russian. https://www.twirpx.com/file/883478/
  4. Makarova MN, Rybakova AV, Gushchin YA, Shed'ko VV, Muzhikyan AA, Makarov VG. Anatomo-fiziologicheskaya kharakteristika pishchevaritel'nogo trakta u cheloveka i laboratornykh zhivotnykh [Anatomical and physiological characteristics of digestive tract in humans and laboratory animals]. Mezhdunarodnyy vestnik veterinari. 2016;1:82-104. Russian. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328137623_Anatomical_and_physiological_characteristics_of_digestive_tract_in_humans_and_laboratory_animals
  5. Tatarenko DP. Pishchevaritel'naya sistema belykh krys: anatomo- funktsional'nyye osobennosti i eksperimental'nyye raboty: monografiya [Digestive system of white rats: anatomical and functional features and experimental work: monograph]. Moskva: RUSAYNS; 2016. 92 р. Russian. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008243071
  6. Shmal'gauzen II. [Fundamentals of Comparative Anatomy]. Moskva: Sovetskaya nauka; 1947. 540 p. Russian.
  7. Hryn VH, Kostylenko YP. Izmenchivost' formy slepoy kishki i cherveobraznogo otrostka u lyudey zrelogo i preklonnogo vozrasta v predelakh ogranichennoy vyborki anatomicheskikh preparatov [Variablity of shape the cecum and the appendix have people of mature and old age within the limited sample anatomical]. Vísnik morfologíí̈. 2011;3(17):501-505. Russian. http://elib.umsa.edu.ua/jspui/handle/umsa/7112
  8. Hryn VH, Kostylenko YP. Strukturno-funktsyonalʹnaya kharakterystyka cherveobraznoho otrostka lyudey v vozrastnom aspekte [Structural and functional characterization of the appendix of people in age’s aspeсt]. Svit medytsyny ta biolohiyi. 2012;2:103-106. Russian. http://elib.umsa.edu.ua/jspui/handle/umsa/428
  9. Kostylenko YP, Prylutsʹkyy OK, Hryn VH, Starchenko II. Anatomiya lyudyny (kurs lektsiy). Navchalʹnyy posibnyk dlya studentiv stomatolohichnykh fakulʹtetiv vyshchykh medychnykh navchalʹnykh zakladiv Ukrayiny IV rivnya akredytatsiyi [Human anatomy (course of lectures). Scientific manual for students of dental faculties of higher medical institutions of Ukraine of IV level of accreditation]. Poltava: eaPSMU; 2015. 188 p. Ukrainian.
  10. Nozdrachev AD, Polyakov YL. [Rat anatomy (laboratory animals)]. St. Petersburg: Lan; 2001. 464 р. Russian. https://www.studmed.ru/nozdrachev-ad-polyakov-el-anatomiya-krysy_0733c6b9cfa.html
  11. Petrenko VM. [The shape and topography of the colon in a white rat]. The successes of modern natural science. 2011;12:17-21. Russian.
  12. Petrenko VM. [The shape and topography of the cecum in the white rat]. The successes of modern natural science. 2012;1:8-11. Russian.
  13. Sinel'nikov RD, Sinel'nikov YR. [Atlas of Human Anatomy]. Moscow: Mir Publishers; 1989. 264 p. Russian.
  14. Kahai P, Mandiga P, Wehrle CJ, Lobo S. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Large Intestine. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020;1:2-4.
  15. Kazantsev IB. Novye predstavleniya o funktsional'noy biomekhanike ileotsekal'nogo klapana [New presentation about functional biomehanic of ileocecal valve]. Byulleten' sibirskoy meditsiny. 2011;10(4):58-64. Russian. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2011-4-58-64
  16. Savin DV. Varianty anatomicheskogo stroyeniya i topografii ileotsekal'nogo zapiratel'nogo aparata [Variants of the anatomical structure and topography of the ileocecal obturator]. Morfologicheskiye vedomosti. 2009;3:122-123. Russian.
  17. Hamilton SR. Structure of the colon. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;93:13-23. PMID: 6374871.
  18. Poyda AI, Polovnikov II, Mel'nik VM. Funktsional'nyye osobennosti tolstoy kishki i ikh primeneniye v kolorektal'noy khirurgii [Functional features of the colon and their application in colorectal surgery]. Nauka ta ínnovatsíí̈. 2018;14(4):42-51. Russian. DOI: doi.org/10.15407/scin14.04.042.
  19. Bokonbayeva SD, Schastlivaya TD, Sushanlo KHM, Aldasheva NM, Afanasenko GP. [Propedeutics of Childhood Diseases: A Textbook for Pediatric Faculties of Medical Universities]. Bishkek: Kyrgyzsko-Rossiyskiy Slavyanskiy universitet (KRSU); 2008. 259 p. Russian.
  20. Khasanov AG, Shevchenko YAR, Badretdinova FF, Ibatullin ER, Shaybakov DG. Diagnostika i lechebnaya taktika pri ostrom appenditsite u beremennykh c bol'shimi srokami gestatsii [Acute Appendicitis Diagnosis and Treatment Strategy for Women in Late Pregnancy]. Kreativnaya khirurgiya i onkologiya. 2019;9(2):100-105. Russian. https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2019-9-2-100-105
  21. Draçini X, Dibra A, Celiku E. Cecal volvulus during pregnancy. Case report. G Chir. 2012;33(4):129-131. PMID: 22668532.
  22. Nesteruk LN, Rylyuk AF. Krovosnabzhenye yleotsekalʹnoho uhla [Blood supply to the ileocecal angle]. Klinichna anatomiya ta operatyvna khirurhiya. 2003;2(3):24-27. Russian.
  23. Wolfram-Gabel R, Maillot C, Koritké JG. Systématisation de l'angioarchitectonie du côlon chez l'homme adulte [Systematization of the angioarchitectonics of the colon in adult man]. Acta Anat (Basel). 1986;125(1):65-72. French. PMID: 3953246.
  24. Ndoye JM, Ndiaye A, Ndiaye A, Dia A, Fall B, Diop M, Sow ML. Topographie et morphométrie cadavériques de l'appendice vermiculaire [Cadaveric topography and morphometry of the vermiform appendix]. Morphologie. 2005;89(285):59-63. French. DOI: 10.1016/s1286-0115(05)83239-4. PMID: 16110740.
  25. Barlow A, Muhleman M, Gielecki J, Matusz P, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. The vermiform appendix: a review. Clin Anat. 2013;26(7):833-842. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22269. Epub 2013 May 29. PMID: 23716128.
  26. Russkikh AN, Andreychikov AV, Makarov AF. Atipichnyye formy raspolozheniya cherveobraznogo otrostka: anatomo-topograficheskoye obosnovaniye [Atypical forms of the worm-like process: anatomical and topographic substantiation]. Sibirskoye meditsinskoye obozreniye. 2012;74(2):30-33. Russian.
  27. Netter F, author; Chaykovskiy YUB, editor: Atlas anatomiyi lyudyny [Atlas of Human Anatomy]. Lviv: Nautilus; 2004. 592 p. Ukrainian.
  28. Nazarov IV, Shutov YUM, Nadeyev AP. Topografo-anatomicheskiye osobennosti raspolozheniya cherveobraznogo otrostka v zavisimosti ot somatotipa cheloveka [Topographic and anatomical features of the location of the appendix depending on the human somatotype]. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2012;3:14. Russian.
  29. Ilić A, Lolić-Draganić V. Mesto projekcije baze apendiksa na prednji trbusni zid [Place of projection of the appendix basis on the front abdominal wall]. Med Glas. 1972;26(7):239-242. Croatian. PMID: 4266609.
  30. Kazantsev IB, Lepunov VV. Osobennosti krovosnabzheniya cherveobraznogo otrostka [Features of the blood supply to the appendix]. In: [All-Russian 68th final student scientific conference named after N.I.Pirogov; 2009 May 11-15; Tomsk, Russia]. Nauka; 2009. p. 329. Russian.
  31. Ajmani ML, Аjmani K. The position, length and arterial supply of vermiform appendix. Anatomischer Anzeiger. 1983;153(4):369-374.
  32. Xiang H, Han J, Ridley WE, Ridley LJ. Vermiform appendix: Normal anatomy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(1):116.
  33. Zahid A. The vermiform appendix: not a useless organ. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2004;14(4):256-258. PMID: 15228837.
  34. Gayvoronskiy GN. Funktsional'naya anatomiya organov pishchevaritel'noy sistemy. Stroyeniye, krovosnabzheniye, innervatsiya, limfoottok. [Functional anatomy of the digestive system. Structure, blood supply, innervation, lymph drainage]. Moskva: Elbi; 2009. 76 p. Russian.
  35. Barsukova IM, Gavshchuk MV, Krivov AP. Ostryy appenditsit: istoriya i sovremennaya organizatsiya meditsinskoy pomoshchi [Acute appendicitis: history and modern organization of medical care]. Uchenyye zapiski SPbGMU im. I.P. Pavlova. 2018;25(3):43-49. Russian.
  36. Kooij IA, Sahami S, Meijer SL, Buskens CJ, Te Velde AA. The immunology of the vermiform appendix: a review of the literature. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;186(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1111/cei.12821. PMID: 27271818; PMCID: PMC5011360.
  37. Kostyukevich SV, Puzyrev AA, Ivanova VF. Endokrinnyy apparat epiteliya slizistoy obolochki cherveobraznogo otrostka cheloveka (cherveobraznyy otrostok – endokrinnaya zheleza, funktsioniruyushchaya v embrional'nyy period?) [The endocrine apparatus of the epithelium of the mucous membrane of the human appendix (appendix - an endocrine gland that functions during the embryonic period?)]. Morfologiya. 1998;113(2):21-35. Russian. https://biomed.szgmu.ru/science/001.pdf
  38. Vitetta L, Chen J, Clarke S. The vermiform appendix: an immunological organ sustaining a microbiome inoculum. Clin Sci. 2019;133(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1042/CS20180956. PMID: 30606811.
  39. Takeuchi T. Factors Involved in the Degeneration of Lymphoid Tissue in the Appendix. Kurume Med J. 2020;65(4):123-127. DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS654006. PMID: 31723079.

Published

2021-10-04

How to Cite

Features of the anatomical structure of the cecum and the appendix in a comparative aspect. (2021). Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 15(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2021.3.9-16

Issue

Section

Статті