Methodical approaches to teaching age features of "Connective tissue proper" in a lecture course and on a practical training on histology

Authors

  • I. S. Khripkov SI "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Dnipro, Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0378-8414
  • A. G. Dudlya SI "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Dnipro, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2020.2.51-57

Keywords:

histology, connective tissue proper, fibroblasts, intercellular matrix, age changes

Abstract

Understanding of cellular and tissue mechanisms which are the cornerstone of age changes of connective tissue allows to create at students of the first courses idea of realization of trophic, mechanical, protective, adaptive functions during various age periods and to create complete approach to assessment of integrative connective tissue of function during various age periods. In work cytotopographical classification of connective tissue proper is provided, characteristic of a cytogenesis and cytophysiology of cells of a fibroblastic differon in age aspect is given, are provided a morph – functional changes of connective tissue in the prenatal and post-natal periods of an ontogenesis. Special attention is devoted to morphogenetic changes of cells of a fibroblastic differon and intercellular matrix of fibrous connective tissue when aging. Age changes of connective tissue are defined by reduction of number and change of a ratio between cell of a fibroblastic differon, decrease in their proliferative and synthetic activity that is followed by changes of quantitative and qualitative structure of an intercellular matrix and it integrative – buffer properties.

References

  1. Akmayev GA, Akmayev IG, Afanasyev YI, Babmindra VP, Bazhenov DV, Bobova LP, Borovaya TG, Brykova TS, Bykov VL, Valkovich EI, Verin VK, Volkova OV, Ganeshina OT, Gemonov VV, Goryachkina VL, Grafova VYa, Grigoryan BA, Danilov RK, Dedukh NV, Dmitriyeva NA, Zueva LV, Zufarov KA, Ivanova VF, Kabak KS, Katinas GS, Kozhukhar VG, Kovalenko RI, Kvetnoy IM, Korzhevsky DE, Kostyukevich SV, Kuznetsov SL, Lutsenko MT, Lychakov DV, Majorov VN, Motavkin PA, Novozhilova AP, Pavlov GG, Pavlova VN, Pankov EYa, Polenov AL, Puzyrev AA, Pyatkina GA, Rossolko GN, Sosunov AA, Sotnikov OS, Hilova YuK, Khmelnytskaya NM, Chelyshev YuA, Shvalev VN, Yuzhakov VV, Yuldashev AY, authors: Guide to histology. In 2 t. T.I. St. Petersburg: Spetslit; 2001. 735 p. Russian.
  2. Omelyanenko N.P., Slutsky L.I. Connective tissue (gistofiziology and biochemistry). M.: Izvestia, 2009. 324 p. Russian.
  3. Bozo IYa, Deyev RV, Pinayev GP ["Fibroblast" – a specialized cell or a functional condition of cells of mezenkhimny origin?]. Cytology. 2010;52(2):99–109. Russian.
  4. Covas D., Panepuccia R., Fontes A. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts. Exp. Hematol. 2008;36:642–54.
  5. Doherty M., Ashton B., Walsh S. Vascular pericytes express osteogenic potential in vitro and in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998;13:828–38.
  6. Doherty M.J., Canfield A.E. Gene expression during vascular pericyte differentiation. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 1999;9:1–17.
  7. Diaz-Flores L., Gutierrez R., Varela H. Microvascular pericytes: a review of their morphological and functional characteristics. Histology Histopathology. 1991;6:269‑86.
  8. Farrington-Rock C., Crofts N., Doherty M. Chondrogenic and adipogenic potential of microvascular pericytes. Circulation 2004;110:2226–32.
  9. Danilov R.K. [General principles of cell organization, development and classification of tissues. Histology Guide.] T.1. – Sankt-Peterburg: SpetsLit, 2001. – 328s. Russian.
  10. Sorrell M., Caplan A.I. Fibroblasts – a diverse population at the center of it all. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009;276:161–214.
  11. Sorrell J.M., Caplan A.I. Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:667–675.
  12. Bayreyter K, Franz P, Rodeman H. [Fibroblasts at a normal and pathological terminal differentiation, aging, apoptosis and transformation]. Ontogenesis. 1995;236(1):22–37. Russian.
  13. Kahari V.M., Saarialho-Kere U. Matrix metalloproteinases in skin. Exp Drmatol. 1997;6:199–213.
  14. Shekhter AB, Berchenko GN. [Fibroblasts and development of connecting fabric: ultrastructural aspects of biosynthesis, fibrillogenesis and catabolism of collagen]. Archive of pathology. 1978;8:70. Russian.
  15. Parsonage G. A stromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:150–56.
  16. Tomasek J., Gabbiani G., Hinz B. Myofibroblasts and mechanoregulation of connective tissue remodelling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:349–63.
  17. Sorrell J.M., Baber M., Caplan A. Site-matched papillary and reticular human dermal fibroblasts differ in their release of specific growth factors/cytokines and in their interaction with keratinocytes. J. Cell.Physiol. 2004;200:134–45.
  18. Kalluri R., Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nature Publishing Group. 2006;6:392–401.
  19. Wiseman B., Werb Z. Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer. Science. 2002;296:1046–9.
  20. Nolte S.V., Xu W., Rennekampff H-O., Rodemann P. Diversity of Fibroblasts – A Review on Implications for Skin Tissue Engineering Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;187:165–76.
  21. Chang H., Chi J-T., Dudoit S. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. PNAS. 2002;99(20):12877–82.
  22. Lee D., Cho K. The effects of epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts on the formation of cutaneous basement membrane in threedimensional culture systems. Arch Dermatol Res. 2005;296:296–302.
  23. Marionnet C., Pierrard C., Vioux-Chagnoleau C. Interactions between fibroblasts and keratinocytes in morphogenesis of dermal epi- dermal junction in a model of reconstructed skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:971–9.
  24. Sorrell J.M., Baber M., Caplan A. Clonal characterization of fibroblasts in the superficial layer of the adult human dermis. Cell Tissue Res. 2003;327:499–510.
  25. Haniffa M., Collin M., Buckley C. Mesenchymal stem cells: the fibroblasts new clothes? Haemotologica 2009;94(2):258–263.
  26. Hogaboam C.M., Steinhauser M.L., Chensue S.W., Kunkel S.L. Novel roles for chemokines and fibroblasts in interstitial fibrosis. Kidney Int 1998;54(6):2152-9.
  27. Stephens P., Genever P. Non-epithelial oral mucosal progenitor cell populations. Oral Diseases 2007;13:1–10.
  28. Herskind C., Bentzen S., Overgaard J. Differentiation state of skin fibroblast cultures versus risk of subcutaneous fibrosis after radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol. 1998;47:263-9.
  29. Rodemann H., Bayreuther К., Francz Р. Selective enrichment and biochemical characterisation of seven fibroblast cell types of human skin fibroblast populations in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 1989;180:84–93.
  30. Hakenjos L., Bamberg H., Rodemann H. TGF-b1-mediated alterations of rat lung fibroblast differentiation resulting in the radiation-induced fibrotic response. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2000;76:503–9.
  31. Dimri G., Lee X., Basile G. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. PNAS USA 1995;92:9363–7.
  32. Soukupova M., Holeckova E. The latent period of explanted organs of newborn, adult and senile rats. Exp. Cell Res. 1964;33:361-7.
  33. Schneider E.L., Mitsui Y. The relationship between in vitro cellular aging and in vivo human age. PNAS USA 1976;73(10):3584–8.
  34. Iudintseva N.M., Blinova M.I., Pinaev G.P. Characteristics of cytoskeleton organization of human normal postnatal, scar and embryonic skin fibroblasts spreading on different proteins of extracellular matrix. Tsitologiia 2008;50(10):861–7.
  35. Reed M.J., Ferara N.S., Vernon R.B. Impaired migration, integrin function, and actin cytoskeletal organization in dermal fibroblasts from a subset of aged human donors. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2001;122(11):1203–20.
  36. Schulze C., Wetzel F., Kueper T. Stiffening of human skin fibroblasts with age. Biophys. J. 2010;99(8):2434–42.
  37. Smith J.R., Pereira-Smith O.M., Schneider E.L. Colony size distributions as a measure of in vivo and in vitro aging. PNAS USA 1978;75(3):1353-6.
  38. Hayflick L. The cell biology of aging. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1979;73(1):8‑14.
  39. Mammone T, Gan D, Foyouzi-Youssefi R. Apoptotic cell death increases with senescence in normal human dermal fibroblast cultures. Cell Biol. Int. 2006;30(11):903–9.
  40. Varani J., Dame M., Rittie L. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin. Roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation.AJP 2006;168(6):1861–8.
  41. Greco M., Villani G., Mazzucchelli F. Marked aging-related decline in efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation in human skin fibroblasts. FASEB J. 2003;17(12):1706–8.
  42. Varani J., Warner R., Gharaee-Kermani M. Vitamin a antagonizes decreased cell growth and elevated collagen-degrading matrix metalloproteinases and stimulates collagen accumulation in naturally aged human skin. J. Inv. Dermatol. 2000;114:480–6.
  43. Smirnova IO. [Functional morphology of aging of skin]. Achievements of gerontology. 2004;13:44–5. Russian.

Downloads

How to Cite

Khripkov, I. S., & Dudlya, A. G. (2020). Methodical approaches to teaching age features of "Connective tissue proper" in a lecture course and on a practical training on histology. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 14(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2020.2.51-57

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Статті

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Morphologia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the Journal the right to the first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which allows other people to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
        By submitting a manuscript to the editorial office of the Journal ‘Morphologia’ authors agree to transfer the rights to protect and use the manuscript (all supplemental materials, particularly protected objects such as photos, drawings, diagrams, tables, etc.), including the reproduction in the press and distribution via the Internet; translation of the manuscript into any language; export and import of journal copies with the Authors’ article in order to make it available for public. Authors convey the rights mentioned above to the editorial office without any temporal or territorial limitation all over the world. 
        The Authors guarantee that they have the exclusive rights to use the material transferred to editorial office. Editors are not responsible to third parties for contraventions of warranty given by the Authors. The considered rights are transferred to the editorial office since the moment when the current issue is signed for publishing. Reproduction of materials published in the Journal by other individuals and legal entities is possible only with the consent of Editorial office, with the obligatory indication of the full bibliographic reference of the primary publication. The Authors reserve the right to use the published material, its fragments and parts for teaching materials, oral presentations, dissertation thesis prepararion with obligatory bibliographic citation of the original paper. Electron copy of the published article, downloaded from official journal web-site in .pdf format may be put by authors on the official web-site of their institutions, any other official resources with open access.