Peculiarities of pathomorphological diagnostics of prostate gland adenosis and presentation of clinical case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2020.3.70-75

Keywords:

аdenosis, adenocarcinoma, morphological peculiarities, prostate gland

Abstract

Background. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) or adenosis of the prostate gland is a pseudoneoplastic process which according to its tissue-architectural and cytological morphological peculiarities often resemble small acinar adenocarcinoma. In modern specialized literature few clinical-morphological peculiarities related to both pathological processes AAH and prostate adenocarcinoma (PA) were described. First, the incidence of AAH increases with age, as does the incidence of PA. Second, AAH lesions are often multifocal, as is PA, and they are located very closely to cancer areas. Third, the incidence of AAH increases in the presence of cancer and, vice versa, cancer incidence increases in cases of diagnosed AAH. Fourth, there are numbers of morphological changes, typical for AAH, which are closely related to highly differentiated PA. Objective of current work is study, analysis and possibilities of application in practice of differential diagnostic criteria of AAH and small acinar carcinomas of the prostate. Methods. In the case proposed for consideration during primary histological examination of prostate gland biopsy taken from 74-year old man AAH was detected. Results and conclusion. However, certain pathomorphological signs more typical for prostatic carcinomas, as well as results of immunohistochemical examination more characteristic for malignant epithelial adenogenous tumors served as the basis for verification of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

References

  1. Pospishil YO, Servetnyk MI, Artyshchuk MF. [Clinical case of primary squamous cell carcinoma of prostate gland]. Patologiya. 2010;7(2):113-15.Ukrainian.
  2. Servetnyk MI, Pospishil YO. [Prostate gland carcinoma: correlations between PSA-level, patient age, stage of tumor growth and Gleason differentiation grade system]. Acta Medica Leopoliensia, Lvivskyi medychnyi chasopys. 2010;16(2):52-57.Ukrainian.
  3. Servetnyk MI, Pospishil YO. [Сlinical and morphological characteristics of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia]. Patologiya. 2011;8(3):30-34. Ukrainian.
  4. Armah HB, Parwani AV. [Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis) of the prostate: a case report with review of the literature]. Diagnostic Pathology. 2008; (3):345–54.
  5. Cheng L, Shan A, Cheville JC, Quian J, Bostwick DG. [Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: a premalignant lesion?]. Cancer Research. 1998;58(3): 389–91.
  6. Bostwick DG, Srigley J, Grignon D, Maksem J, Humphrey P, van der Kwast TH, Bose D, Harrison J, Young RH. [Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: morphologic criteria for its distinction from well-differentiated carcinoma]. Human Pathology. 1993;24(8):819–32. DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90131-y.
  7. Baydar DE. [Adenosis (Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia) of Prostate]. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2015;1:53–54. DOI: 10.4274/jus.2015.01.018.
  8. Bostwick DG, Qian J. [Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Relationship with carcinoma in 217 whole-mount radical prostatectomies]. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1995;19:506–18.DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199505000-00002.
  9. Epstein JI, Netto GJ, authors; Shaw R, editor. Biopsy Interpretation of Prostate. 5th edition. Philadelphia (USA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. 425 p.
  10. Yang XJ, Wu CL, Woda BA, Dresser K, Tretiakova M, Fanger GR, Jiang Z. [Expression of alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate]. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2002;26(7): 921–5. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200207000-00011.
  11. Gaudin PB, Epstein JI. [Adenosis of the prostate. Histologic features in needle biopsy specimens]. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1995;19:737–47. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199507000-00001.
  12. Doll JA, Zhu X, Furman J, Kaleem Z, Torres C, Humphrey PA, Donis-Keller H. [Genetic analysis of prostatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis)]. American Journal of Pathology.1999;155(3):967–71.DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65196-6
  13. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours 3. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. 353 p.
  14. Buhmeida A, Pyrhonen S, Laato M, Collan Y. [Prognostic factors in prostate cancer]. Diagnostic Pathology. 2006;1:74–82. DOI:10.1186/1746-1596-1-4.
  15. Qian J, Jenkins RB, Bostwick DG. [Chromosomal anomalies in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate using fluorescence in situ hybridization]. Urology. 1995;46:837–42. DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80354-9.
  16. Hansel DE, Herawi M, Montgomery E, Epstein JI. [Spindle cell lesions of the adult prostate]. Modern Pathology. 2007;20:148–58. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800676.
  17. Thompson EW, Newgreen DF, Tarin D. [Carcinoma invasion and metastasis: a role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition?]. Cancer Research. 2005;65(14):5991–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0616.
  18. Trpkov K. [Benign mimics of prostatic adenocarcinoma]. Modern Pathology. 2018;31:22-46.

Downloads

How to Cite

Servetnyk, M. I., & Pospishil, Y. O. (2020). Peculiarities of pathomorphological diagnostics of prostate gland adenosis and presentation of clinical case. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 14(3), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2020.3.70-75

Issue

Section

Статті