Histological and immunohistochemical features of the ovarian malignant tumors with different histogenesis.

Authors

  • O. A. Savchenko SI «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Dnipro, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2019.3.120-125

Keywords:

serous tumors, mucinous tumors, light cell tumors, serous-mucinous tumors, Brenner tumors, benign and borderline tumors, highly differentiated ovarian carcinomas, immunohistochemical profile

Abstract

Background. Among neoplastic gynecologic diseases, ovarian cancer is in the top five in mortality, ranking fourth. These facts are explained, on the one hand, by the lack of specific clinical manifestations, which causes the diagnosis of the process in its later stages with often metastatic lesions. On the other hand, there is the problem of reliable verification of the diagnosis. The division of ovarian cancer into type 1 and type 2 indicates different patterns of ontogeny. The objective of the study is to improve the complex of differential diagnostic morphological criteria for the verification of benign, borderline and malignant ovarian tumors, based on the latest international classifications. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 169 ovarian epithelial tumors, including 37 cases of benign tumors, 120 cases of borderline tumors and 12 highly differentiated carcinomas of various histological types, included the evaluation of immunohistochemical features with subsequent statistical processing of the results obtained. Results. In all groups of epithelial tumors of the ovary, certain groups and differences of different histological features (changes in the structure of the cover epithelium, polymorphism of tumor cells) and features of immunophenotypes of the investigated tumors were revealed. These data make it possible to speak about the diagnostic value of each indicator for the investigated epithelial tumors of the ovaries. Сonclusion. Among the histological characteristics of importance were: epithelium cover, the degree of expression of polymorphism, the indicator of mitotic activity. Among the panel of immunohistochemical antibodies are the cytokeratin fractions (cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20), the nature of staining on Ki-67, p53, WT-1, EMA and CA-125.

References

  1. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH WHO Classification of tumors of female reproductive organs. Revised 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2014. p.307 .
  2. Shepherd-Littlejohn AL, Hanft WJ, Kennedy VA, Alvarez EA. Afatinib use in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019;29:70-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.001.
  3. Fletcher CDM. Diagnostic histopatology of tumors. Vol 1. PA: Elsevier. 2013. p.658-688.
  4. Jones S, Wang TL, Kurman RJ, Nakayama K, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Shih IeM. Low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary contain very few point mutations. J Pathol. 2012;226(3):413-20. doi: 10.1002/path.3967.
  5. Pozharisskii, КМ, Raskin HА, Vinokurov VL, Yurkova LE, Mukhina МS. Immunohistikhimicheskie osobennosti kletok seroznoi adenokarzinomy yaichnikov, opredeliaiushchie klinicheskoe techenie zabolevaniia i vyzhivaemost bolnykh [Immunohistochemical features of ovarian serous adenocarcinoma cells that determine the clinical course of the disease and patient survival]. Pathology Archive, 2015;77(1):38-40. Russian. DOI:10.17116/patol201577138-
  6. Ahn G, Folkins AK, McKenney JK, Longacre TA. Low-grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 52 Invasive Cases and Identification of a Possible Noninvasive Intermediate Lesion. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2016;40(9):1165–1176. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000693.
  7. Bennett JA, Dong F, Young RH, Oliva E. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: evaluation of prognostic parameters based on a clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases. Histopathology. 2015;66(6):808-15. doi: 10.1111/his.12514.
  8. Okoye E, Euscher ED, Malpica A. Ovarian Low-grade Serous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic Study of 33 Cases With Primary Surgery Performed at a Single Institution. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2016;40(5):627–635. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000615.
  9. Miyamoto M, Takano M, Aoyama T, Soyama , Yoshikawa T, Tsuda H, Furuya K. Seromucinous component in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma as a histological predictor of prognosis. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2018;29(2):20-27. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e20
  10. Kumar GL, Rudbeck L.: DAKO Transl. Frank GA, Malkova PG [Immunohistochemical methods: Manual]. Moscow. 2011. p.224. Russian.
  11. Hannibal CG, Vang R, Junge J, Frederiksen K, Kurman RJ, Kjaer SK. A nationwide study of ovarian serous borderline tumors in Denmark 1978-2002. Risk of recurrence, and development of ovarian serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(1):174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.007.

How to Cite

Savchenko, O. A. (2019). Histological and immunohistochemical features of the ovarian malignant tumors with different histogenesis. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 13(3), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2019.3.120-125

Issue

Section

Статті