Change of the shape of the proximal metaepiphysis of the femoral bone after corrective osteotomy.

Authors

  • O. E. Olijnik ГУ «Днепропетровская медицинская академия МЗ Украины», Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2015.2.11-17

Keywords:

proximal methaepiphysis, the femoral bone, correcting osteotomy, endoprosthesis

Abstract

Background. The changes of the shape of the proximal part of the femur due to the pathological process and consequences of osteotomy have the significant influence on the steps of surgical intervention and on the choice of the construction of endoprosthesis stem. Objective. To determine the shape of the proximal part of femoral channel after the correcting osteotomy from the viewpoint of the following hip joint replacement. Methods. Criteria of evaluation of changes of the shape of the proximal part of the femur were proposed by authors. It allows evaluating the grade of deformity and the necessity of the surgical manipulations on the proximal methaepiphysis. This work was based on the analysis of the data of examination of 30 patients, which were undergone the hip joint replacement after correcting osteotomy. Results. The main criterion of the deformity of the proximal methaepiphysis of the femoral bone was determined by the grade of deviation of the proximal fragment from the femoral axis. It was noted, that after the correcting osteotomy of the proximal part of the femur the significant changes of the shape of methaepiphysys and bone channel had formed. The basic criteria of the evaluation of osteotomy influence on the normal antropometrical parameters after hip joint replacement was the angle of deviation of the proximal methaepiphysis from the femoral axis. Conclusion. The x-ray-morphometric data analysis of the proximal part of the femur after correcting osteotomy revealed that in case of deviation of the axis of the proximal methaepiphysis of the femur at the angle more than 10o from the axis of femoral diaphysis and also in all cases of combined osteotomies the reosteotomy for the implantation of standard endoprosthesis stem is recommended.

References

  1. Gorjachev AN. [Evolution of the surgical treatment approaches during coxarthroses]. Annaly travmatologii i ortopedii Rossii. 1996;3:21-2. Russian.
  2. Grashhenkova TN, Filippenko VA. [Rehabilitation treatment after hip joint reconstructive operations]. Lіtopys travmatologіi ta ortopedіi. 1999;3:39-41. Russian.
  3. Vakulenko VM, Kandzyuba AІ, Akzhіgіtov YuG, et al. [Total hip replacement during diseases and injuries of the hip joint]. In: [Proceedings of the 12th congress of orthopedists and traumatologists of Ukraine; 1996; Kyiv, Ukraine]. 1996:116-7. Ukrainian.
  4. Korzh OO, Fіlіpenko VA. [Evolution of the views concerning reconstructive operations during degenerative and dystrophic diseases of the hip joint]. Vіsnyk ortopedіi, travmatologіi ta protezuvannya. 1999;1(25):27-8. Russian.
  5. Kulish NI, Miteleva ZM, Vatamanica BG. [Indications for the surgical treatment of the coxarthrose and its principles]. In: [Proceedings of the 4th Congress of orthopedists and traumatologists of the Soviet Union; 1982; Moscow, Russia]. 1982: 264-7. Russian.
  6. Loskutov AE. [Development of the module hip replacement with the ORTEN systems]. Orthopaedics, traumatology and prosthetics. 1997;1:5-8. Russian.
  7. Pavlіshen YuІ, Zavyalets ІT, Shatalyuk BP. [Operative treatment for the dege-nerative and dystrophic disesases of the hip joint] In: [Proceedings of the Plenum of orthopedists and traumatologists of Ukraine. 1998; Kyiv - Odesa, Ukraine]. 1998;1:122-3. Ukrainian.
  8. Petkevichus LL. [About surgical treatment of bilateral coxarthrose]. In: [Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of orthopedists and traumatologists of Baltic States. 1972; Riga, Latvia]. 1972: 312-4. Russian.
  9. Korzh AA, Kulish NI, Tankut VA, Kolotev SV. [Modern views concerning total hip replacement and perspectives for development of the hip joint mobilizing operations]. Orthopaedics, traumatology and prosthetics. 1985;2:1-5. Russian.
  10. Tankut VA, Filippenko VA, Vyrva OE. [Reconstructive operations during various forms of the coxarthrose]. Lіtopys travmatologії ta ortopedії. 2000;1:25-7. Russian.
  11. Lobenko AA, Polіvoda AM, Gerasimenko SІ, et al. [Surgical rehabilitation for the patients with hip joint injuries]. In: [Proceedings of the 12th con-gress of orthopedists and traumatologists of Ukraine; 1996; Kyiv, Ukraine]. 1996:136-7. Ukrainian.
  12. Shvets OІ. [Surgical rehabilitation during diseases and injuries of the hip joint]. In: [Proceedings of the Ukrainian scientific and practice conference “Total hip replacement: indicatons, technique and mistakes]. 1997; Kyiv-Dnіpropetrovsk, Ukraine]. 1997: 89-91. Ukrainian.
  13. Fuchs B, Knothe U, Hertel R, Ganz R. Femoral osteotomy and iliac graft vascularization for femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jul; (412): 84-93. PMID: 12838057.
  14. Parvizi J, Frankle MA, Tiegs RD, Sim FH. Corrective osteotomy for deformity in Paget disease. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003;85(4):697-702.
  15. McBride MT, Muldoon MP, Santore RF, Trousdale RT, Wenger DR. Protrusio acetabuli: diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2001;9(2):79-88. PMID: 11281632.
  16. Windhager R, Pongracz N, Schonecker N, Katz R. Chiari osteotomy for congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip: results after 20 to 34 years follow up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1991;73(6):890-5. PMID: 1955430.
  17. Hirose K, Takagi H, Iwata H. Case report - total hip arthroplasty after femoral osteotomy. Clin. Calcium. 2004;14(7):114-7. PMID: 15577087.
  18. Kawate K, Tanaka Y, Ohmura T, Hiyoshi N, Yajima H, Tomita Y, Takakura Y. Twenty-five years follow-up of patients who had valgus osteotomy for arthritic hips. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004;426:151-8. PMID: 15346067.
  19. Than P, Halmai V, Shaikh S, Kranicz J, Bellyei A. Long-term results of dero-tational femoral varus osteotomy in Legg-Calve-Perthes disease: 26-year follow-up. Orthopedics. 2003;26(5):487-91. PMID: 12755212.
  20. Drescher W, Furst M, Hahne HJ, Helfenstein A, Petersen W, Hassenpflug J. Survival analysis of hips treated with flexion osteotomy for femoral head necrosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2003;85(7):969-74. PMID: 14516029.
  21. Schai PA, Exner GU. [Indication for and results of intertrochanteric osteotomy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis]. Orthopade. 2002;31(9):900-7. German. PMID: 12232709.
  22. Schmid OA, Hemmer S, Wunsche P, Hirschfelder H. The adult hip after femoral varus osteotomy in patients with unilateral Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B. 2003;12(1):33-7. PMID: 12488769.
  23. Rybachuk OI, Musjeru LM, Charl'z DD. [Intertrochanteric corrective osteotomy for the treatment of deformations of the proximal femur]. Orthopaedics, traumatology and prosthetics. 1988;10:23-34. Russian.
  24. Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson, RL, McCarthy JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger then thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1981;63(9):1426-34. PMID: 7320033.
  25. Kulish NI, Tankut VA, Filippenko VA, Skliarenko ET, Livenets VN. [Reconstructive operations for hip joint pathology: Guidelines]. Kharkiv; 1989. 67 p. Russian.

Downloads

How to Cite

Olijnik, O. E. (2015). Change of the shape of the proximal metaepiphysis of the femoral bone after corrective osteotomy. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 9(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2015.2.11-17

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Статті

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Morphologia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the Journal the right to the first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which allows other people to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
        By submitting a manuscript to the editorial office of the Journal ‘Morphologia’ authors agree to transfer the rights to protect and use the manuscript (all supplemental materials, particularly protected objects such as photos, drawings, diagrams, tables, etc.), including the reproduction in the press and distribution via the Internet; translation of the manuscript into any language; export and import of journal copies with the Authors’ article in order to make it available for public. Authors convey the rights mentioned above to the editorial office without any temporal or territorial limitation all over the world. 
        The Authors guarantee that they have the exclusive rights to use the material transferred to editorial office. Editors are not responsible to third parties for contraventions of warranty given by the Authors. The considered rights are transferred to the editorial office since the moment when the current issue is signed for publishing. Reproduction of materials published in the Journal by other individuals and legal entities is possible only with the consent of Editorial office, with the obligatory indication of the full bibliographic reference of the primary publication. The Authors reserve the right to use the published material, its fragments and parts for teaching materials, oral presentations, dissertation thesis prepararion with obligatory bibliographic citation of the original paper. Electron copy of the published article, downloaded from official journal web-site in .pdf format may be put by authors on the official web-site of their institutions, any other official resources with open access.