Morphological aspects of protective influence of carbonic enterosorbent and granulocyte colony stimulating factor on small intestine in case of Melphalan administration.

Authors

  • O. O. Shevchuk ДВНЗ «Тернопільський державний медичний університет імені І.Я.Горбачевського МОЗ України», Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2015.3.117-121

Keywords:

small intestine, melphalan, carbonic enterosorbent, granulocyte colony stimulating factor

Abstract

Background. High toxicity of anti-cancer drugs limits the efficacy of the treatment of malignant tumors. The most frequent side effects are the injury of highly proliferative cell and tissues: hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Our previous study showed high myeloprotective activity of combination of carbonic enterosorbent and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The objective of this investigation is to study the morphologic characteristic of small intestine in case of melphalan injection and pharmacocorrection with carbonic granulated enterosorbent C2 and filgrastim. Methods. Histologic structure of jejunum of healthy male inbred rats, after the melphalan injection (4 mg/kg) and its correction with enterosorption and filgrastim apart, and in combination was investigated. Results. Cytostatic melphalan caused the dilation of microcirculatory vessels and expressed perivasal edema leading to enlargement of intestinal villi. It was revealed a large amount of lymphocytes and histiocytes in stroma and signs of increasing secretory activity of glandular cells. Dystrophic changes of the epithelium were seen. The enteral sorptive therapy showed prominent improvement of morphologic characteristic of jejunum. But sighs of increased mucus production were still seen. The granulocyte colony stimulating factor has no effects on small intestine structures. The combination of carbonic enterosorbent and filgrastim improved the histologic picture maximally. Conclusion. Combination of enterosorption and granulocyte colony stimulating factor is a prospective approach to diminish the gastrointestinal toxicity of cytostatic therapy.

References

  1. [The 10 leading causes of death in the world, 2000 and 2012]. World Health Organization Fact sheet №310. May, 2014.
  2. [Cancer in Ukraine, 2013-2014]. Bulletin of national cancer registry of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2015. 104 p. Ukrainian.
  3. Stringer AM, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Logan RM, Yeoh AS, Keefe DM. Chemotherapy-induced mucositis: The role of gastrointestinal microflora and mucins in the luminal environment. J Support Oncol. 2007 Jun;5(6):259-67. PMID: 17624050.
  4. Stringer AM, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Keefe DM. Chemotherapy-induced modifications to gastrointestinal microflora: evidence and implications of change. Current Drug Metabolism. 2009; 10:79-83. PMID: 19149515.
  5. Szwajcer D, Czaykowski P, Turner D. Assessment and management of febrile neutropenia in emergency departments within a regional health authority – a benchmark analysis. Curr Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(6):280-4. PMID: 22184489.
  6. Shevchuk OO, Posokhova КА, Todor IN, Lukianova NY, Nikolaev VG, Chekhun VF. [Prevention of myelosuppression by combined treatment with enterosorbent and granulocyte colonystimulating factor]. Exp Oncol. 2015 Jun;37(2):135-8. PMID: 26112942.
  7. Lilley R, author. [Pathohistological techniques and practical histochemistry]. Moscow: Mir; 1969. 648 p. Russian.
  8. Polevichenko EV. [Alimentary mucositis in oncological patients: the new ways of supportive nutrition]. Lechashchii vrach. 2009;(8):91-3. Russian.
  9. Bobrov AP, Tkachenko TB. [Changes of mucous membrane of oral cavity in oncological patients on the background of chemotherapy]. Stomatologiia. 2006;(6):70-3. Russian.

How to Cite

Shevchuk, O. O. (2015). Morphological aspects of protective influence of carbonic enterosorbent and granulocyte colony stimulating factor on small intestine in case of Melphalan administration. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 9(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2015.3.117-121

Issue

Section

Статті