Prognostic significance of stromal сomponent in prostate cancer.

Authors

  • I. I. Yakovtsova Kharkiv Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Ukraine
  • P. V. Tkachenko Kharkiv Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Ukraine
  • O. V. Dolgaya Kharkiv Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Ukraine
  • I. V. Ivachno Kharkiv Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.3.342-348

Keywords:

prostate cancer, desmoplasіa, reactive stroma, prognosis, immunohistochemistry

Abstract

Background. Stroma is a crucial factor in the growth and progression of prostate cancer. However, the morphological and molecular biological signs of cancer stroma that define prognosis of the disease have been investigated insufficiently. Objective. To identify relationships between morphological, immunohistochemical (vimentin, smooth muscle actin-α, MMP-9, collagen type IV) characteristics of the cancer stroma and criteria of aggressive clinical behavior, the risk of recurrence of prostate cancer. Metods. Stroma of the tumors was quantified in 112 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Cancers were divided into three risk groups. Immunohistochemical study was conducted on the material of 33 cases of prostate cancer, 10 cases of normal prostate and 11 cases of atypical hyperplasia, in total 54 cases. The 2 test and Spearman rank correlation coefficient where used to compare the studied features. Results. Desmoplasia of prostate cancer occurred in 61.6% of cases, low, moderate and high grade in 29.5%, 25.9% and 6,2% respectively. Expression of vimentin, smooth muscle actin-α, MMP-9, collagen type IV in the cancer stroma where not uniform. Conclusion. Decrease of differentiation of prostate cancer from G1 to G2 was associated with increased degree of tumor desmoplasia, identified tendency to reduce desmoplasia level with decreasing differentiation to G3. Also revealed, the less differentiated tumor, the more expressed peritumoral reactive fibrosis. Absence of desmoplasia typical for low-risk prostate cancer, moderate and severe desmoplasia associated with cancers of the intermediate risk group. Stroma of prostate cancer with decreasing of tumor differentiation and growth of aggressive clinical behavior characterized by the disappearance of the collagen type IV, tendency to decrease smooth muscle actin-α and increase expression of vimentin because of increasing the number of tumor-associated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. In the stromal cells with decreasing differentiation of prostate cancer and increasing the risk of recurrence has tended to increase of MMP-9 expression.

References

  1. Fedorenko ZP, Michailovich YY, Goulak LO, Gorokh YL, Ryzhov AY, Koutsenko LB, authors; Kolesnik OO, editor: [Bulletin of national cancer registry of Ukraine №17: “Cancer in Ukraine, 2014-2015”]. Kyiv: National cancer institute of Ukraine; 2016. 83 p. Ukraine.
  2. Zellweger T, Günther S, Zlobec I, Savic S, Sauter G, Moch H, Mattarelli G, Eichenberger T, Curschellas E, Rüfenacht H, Bachmann A, Gas-ser TC, Mihatsch MJ, Bubendorf L. Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small-volume or low-grade prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009 May 1;124(9):2116-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24174.
  3. Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Andriole GL, Garnick MB, Petrylak DP. The utility of prostate-specific antigen in the management of advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):548-60. doi: 10.1111/bju.12061.
  4. Fisher G, Yang ZH, Kudahetti S, Møller H, Scardino P, Cuzick J, Berney DM; Transatlantic Prostate Group. Prognostic value of Ki-67 for pros-tate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):271-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.598.
  5. De Wever O, Mareel M. Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion. J Pathol. 2003 Jul;200(4):429-47.
  6. Taylor RA, Risbridger GP. Prostatic tumor stroma: a key player in cancer progression. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008 Sep;8(6):490-7.
  7. Yanagisawa N, Li R, Rowley D, Liu H, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, Ayala GE. Stromogenic prostatic carcinoma pattern (carcinomas with reactive stromal grade 3) in needle biopsies predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients after radical prostatectomy. Hum Pathol. 2007 Nov;38(11):1611-20.
  8. Tomas D, Spajić B, Milosević M, Demirović A, Marusić Z, Kruslin B. Intensity of stromal changes predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostatic carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010 Nov;44(5):284-90. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.485578.
  9. Silva MM Jr, Matheus WE, Garcia PV, Stopiglia RM, Billis A, Ferreira U, Fávaro WJ. Characterization of reactive stroma in prostate can-cer: involvement of growth factors, metalloprotein-ase matrix, sexual hormones receptors and prostatic stem cells. Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Sep-Oct;41(5):849-58. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0355.
  10. European Association of Urology. Guide-lines on prostate cancer, 2015. Available from: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/09-Prostate-Cancer_LR.pdf
  11. Billis A, Meirelles L, Freitas LL, Polidoro AS, Fernandes HA, Padilha MM, Magna LA, Reis LO, Ferreira U. Adenocarcinoma on needle prostatic biopsies: does reactive stroma predicts biochemical recurrence in patients following radical prostatectomy? Int Braz J Urol. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):320-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.03.04.
  12. Ayala G, Tuxhorn JA, Wheeler TM, Frolov A, Scardino PT, Ohori M, Wheeler M, Spitler J, Rowley DR. Reactive stroma as a predictor of biochemical-free recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 15;9(13):4792-801.
  13. Wu JP, Huang WB, Zhou H, Xu LW, Zhao JH, Zhu JG, Su JH, Sun HB. Intensity of stro-mal changes is associated with tumor relapse in clin-ically advanced prostate cancer after castration therapy. Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):710-4. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129131.
  14. Krušlin B, Ulamec M, Tomas D. Prostate cancer stroma: an important factor in cancer growth and progression. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015 May 13;15(2):1-8. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.449.
  15. Placencio VR, Sharif-Afshar AR, Li X, Huang H, Uwamariya C, Neilson EG, Shen MM, Matusik RJ, Hayward SW, Bhowmick NA. Stromal transforming growth factor-beta signaling mediates prostatic response to androgen ablation by paracrine Wnt activity. Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 15;68(12):4709-18. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6289.
  16. Wikström P, Marusic J, Stattin P, Bergh A. Low stroma androgen receptor level in normal and tumor prostate tissue is related to poor outcome in prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2009 Jun 1;69(8):799-809. doi: 10.1002/pros.20927.
  17. Singh M, Jha R, Melamed J, Shapiro E, Hayward SW, Lee P. Stromal androgen receptor in prostate development and cancer. Am J Pathol. 2014 Oct;184(10):2598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.06.022.
  18. Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, Smith VC, Dang TD, Rowley DR. Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Sep;8(9):2912-23.
  19. Dong Z, Nemeth JA, Cher ML, Palmer KC, Bright RC, Fridman R. Differential regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (timp-1) and timp-2 expression in co-cultures of prostate cancer and stromal cells. Int J Cancer. 2001; 93:507-15.
  20. Szarvas T, von Dorp F, Ergun S, Rubben H. Matrix metalloproteinases and their clinical relevance in urinary bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 May;8(5):241-54. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.44.
  21. Nozawa H, Chiu C, Hanahan D. Infiltrating neutrophils mediate the initial angiogenic switch in a mouse model of multistage carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12493-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601807103.
  22. Folgueras AR, Pendas AM, Sanchez LM, Lopez-Otin C. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: from new functions to improved inhibition strategies. Int J Dev Biol 2004; 48: 411–24.

How to Cite

Yakovtsova, I. I., Tkachenko, P. V., Dolgaya, O. V., & Ivachno, I. V. (2016). Prognostic significance of stromal сomponent in prostate cancer. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 10(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.3.342-348

Issue

Section

Статті