Comparison of immunohistochemical characteristics of expression estrogen receptors-alpha, progesterone receptors, p16, p53, Ki-67 and caspase 3 in invasive endometrial adenocarcinoma of different grade.

Authors

  • V. A. Tumanskiy Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine
  • A. V. Chepets Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.3.302-307

Keywords:

карцинома эндометрия, рецепторы эстрогена – α, рецепторы прогестерона, р53, р16, Ki-67, каспаза-3, степень опухолевой дифференцировки

Abstract

Background. Endometrial cancer occupies the sixth place among newly diagnosed neoplasm in women each year. Objective. Immunohistochemical characterization of the expression of the estrogen receptors-α, progesterone receptors, p16, p53, Ki-67, caspase-3 by the cells of invasive endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas of various grade. Methods. The invasive endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (stage pT1-4MxNxG1-3) in the uteruses of 56 perimenopausal women with the verified diagnosis of endometrial cancer were analyzed. For this purpose, immunohistochemical and morphometrical studies were used. Results. The expression levels of p16 and Ki-67 significantly reduce in the tumor cells (р<0,05). The caspase-3 expression level significantly increased in the tumor stromal cells with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) grade increasing (p<0.05). The FIGO grade of the invasive endometrioid endometrial carcinoma has significant relations with the expression levels of the estrogen receptor-α (γ=-0,68), progesterone receptors (γ=-0,78), p53 (γ=-0,45 in the group of adenocarcinomas with low and high expression levels of p53; γ=0,75 in the adenocarcinomas group with overexpression of p53 ), p16 (γ=0,76), Ki-67 (γ=0,34), caspase-3 (γ=-0,84) in the tumor cells and estrogen receptor -α (γ = -0,36), caspase-3 expression levels in tumor stromal cells (γ = 0,84). Conclusion. With increasing of FIGO grade of the invasive endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma the sensitivity of tumor cells to regulatory signals of estrogen and progesterone decreases. The expression level of p16 increases, which indicates the violations of p16-associated cell cycle control mechanism. The proliferation level of tumor cell increases and the level of tumor cells apoptosis decreases.

References

  1. Stewart BW, Wild CP. World cancer report 2014. IARC. Geneva: WHO Press; 2014. 630p.
  2. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, author; Tavassoli FA, Devilee P; editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003, 432p.
  3. Bender D, Buekers T, Leslie KK. Hormone receptors and endometrial cancer. Proceedings in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;2(1):1–25.
  4. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484);491–505.
  5. Horrée N, van Diest PJ, Sie-Go DM, Heintz AP. The invasive front in endometrial carcinoma: higher proliferation and associated derailment of cell cycle regulators. Human Pathology. 2007;38:1232-8.
  6. Peiró G, Diebold J, Baretton GB, Kimmig R, Löhrs U. Cellular apoptosis susceptibility gene expression in endometrial carcinoma: correlation with bcl-2, bax, caspase-3 expression and outcome. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2001;20(4):359-67.
  7. Dabbs DJ, editor. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Theranostic and Genomic Applications. 3rd ed. New York: Saunders; 2009. P766.
  8. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark G. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Modern Pathology. 1998;11:155-68.
  9. Risberg B, Karlsson K, Abeler V, Lagrelius A, Davidson B, Karlsson MG. Dissociated expression of Bcl-2 and Ki-67 in endometrial lesions: diagnostic and histogenetic implications. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2002;21(2):155-60.
  10. Buchynska LG, Nesina IP. Expression of the cell cycle regulators p53, p21WAF1/CIP1 and p16INK4A in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. Experimental Oncology. 2006:28(2);152-5.
  11. Tumanskyi VO, Yevsieiev AV, Kovalenko IS, Zubko MD, inventors. Zaporizhia state medical university. [Method of photo digital morphometrical study of immunohistochemical micropreparations]. Ukraine patent UA 99314. 2015. Int. CI. G01N 21/00, G06K 9/0. Ukrainian.
  12. Markova I, Duskova M, Lubusky M, Kudela M, Zapletalová J, Procházka M, Pilka R. Selected Immunohistochemical Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2010;20:576-82.
  13. Han G, Sidhu D, Duggan MA, Arseneau J, Cesari M, Clement PB. Reproducibility of histological cell type in high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Modern Pathology. 2013;26:1594-604.
  14. Stanescu AD, Nistor I, Poteca AG, Ditescu D, Comanescu М. Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2014;55(4):1339-44.
  15. Guo ZL, Chen K, Wang, XQ, Hu W. [Ex-pression and relationship of Ezh2, Runx3 and caspase-3 in endometrial adenocarcinoma.]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2011;40(6):387-91.

How to Cite

Tumanskiy, V. A., & Chepets, A. V. (2016). Comparison of immunohistochemical characteristics of expression estrogen receptors-alpha, progesterone receptors, p16, p53, Ki-67 and caspase 3 in invasive endometrial adenocarcinoma of different grade. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 10(3), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.3.302-307

Issue

Section

Статті