An integral analysis of the acetabular parameters for the pathomorphological evaluation of dysplastic hip arthritis.

Authors

  • O. Ye. Oleynik State institution «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine
  • T. O. Zub State institution «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.2.55-61

Keywords:

dysplastic hip arthritis, acetabulum, prosthetic cup, petal diagram

Abstract

Background. Despite the successes in the hip arthroplasty the incidence of complications in cases of dysplastic hip arthritis remains higher then after other forms of hip arthritis. Objective. To pick up the anthropometric criteria of dysplastic acetabulum that determine the correct implantation of the hip implant’s cup. Methods. X-ray anthropometric analysis was carried out for 194 dysplastic acetabula, which were divided into 4 groups according to classification by Eftekhar N.S. The same parameters of 70 normal acetabula are studied. Results. Petal diagrams with 4 axes were constructed to visualize the changes in the shape of the dysplastic acetabulum. On each axis of the diagram one of next parameters was deposited: the acetabular width and depth, the thickness of acetabular bottom and the index of the acetabulum, which is calculated as the ratio of depth to width. The indices of the normal acetabular parameters were taken as 1, and the dysplastic indices were expressed as fractions of 1. Variations in the shape of the acetabulum according to Eftekkar’s classification are described. An algorithm of action for the implantation of the endoprosthetic cup is proposed for each type of deformation. Also the sketches of preoperative planning for each type of the deformation are presented. Discussion. The ratio of the depth of the acetabulum and the thickness of its bottom is the most significant for the correct implantation of the cup. This indicator enables to surgeon to make the decision about resection of the acetabular bottom during the preparing of the implant’s bed. The acetabular width becomes the determining criterion for the dicision on requarment for bone grafting of acetabular roof only for types C and D by Eftekhar. Conclusion. The proposed technique allows to visualize the acetabular deformation from the position of hip replacement in cases of dysplastic hip arthritis. Also this one is suitable for other nosological forms of hip arthritis.

References

  1. Chen KH, Wang HY, Sung CS, Wu PK, Chen CF, Liu CL, Chen WM. Wake-up test in total hip arthroplasty with high-riding developmental dysplasia. Оrthopedics. 2014;37(7):625–30. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140626-53.
  2. Zagra L. Advances in hip arthroplasty sur-gery: what is justified?. EFFORT Open Rev. 2017;2:172-8. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008.
  3. Maheshwari R, Neill GO, Marsh A, Hussain S, Patil S, Meek RMD, et al. Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia of the hip using wagner cone prosthesis with small diameter metal-on-metal articulation. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2013;2:137.
  4. Watts CD, Abdel MP, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW Anatomic hip center decreases aseptic loosen-ing rates after total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients with Crowe type-II dysplasia: A concise follow-up report at a mean of thirty-six years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(11):910-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00902.
  5. Yamamuro TJ. CDH or DDH?. Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13:111-12.
  6. Torchynskyi V, Gaiko G. [Corrective osteot-omies of the proximal femur in the treatment of adult patients with coxarthrosis of dysplastic gene-sis]. Trauma. 2008;9(3). Available from http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/article_print/20384. Ukrainian.
  7. Bliznyukov VV, Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Denisov AO, Shilnikov VA, Chernyi AZh, Bilyk SS. [Hip arthroplasty in patients with complex femoral deformity after surgical treatment of dysplasia]. Travmatologiya i Ortopediya Rossii. 2014;4:5-15. Russian.
  8. Abolghasemian M, Drexler M, Abdelbary H, Sayedi H, Backstein D, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross AE. Revision of the acetabular component in dysplastic hips previously reconstructed with a shelf autograft: Study of the outcome with special assessment of bone-stock changes. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:777–81. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.
  9. Busch VJ, Clement ND, Mayer PF, Breusch SJ, Howie CR. High survivorship of cemented sock-ets with roof graft for severe acetabular dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3032–40. doi 10.1007/s11999-012-2346-z.
  10. Oe K, Iida H, Kawamura H, Ueda N, Nakamura T, Okamoto N, Ueda Y. Long-term re-sults of acetabular reconstruction using three bulk bone graft techniques in cemented total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia. Int Orthop. 2016;40(9):1949-54. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3039-5.
  11. Faraj AA, Assad SK. Arthroplasty for ne-glected high developmental dysplasia of the Hip. Hip specialist or general orthopedic surgeon. Asian Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017;2(1):37-43.
  12. Lohmann CH, Rampal S, Lohrengel M, Singh G. Imaging in peri-prosthetic assessment: an orthopaedic perspective. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):117-25. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160058.
  13. Eftekhar NS. Total Hip Arthroplasty, 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993: 927 p.
  14. Korzh O, Tikhonenkov Ye, Andrianov V, Miteleva Z, Pozdnikin Yu. [Dysplastic coxarthrosis: Surgical prevention and treatment]. Мoskva: Meditsina;1986: 208 p. Russian.

How to Cite

Oleynik, O. Y., & Zub, T. O. (2018). An integral analysis of the acetabular parameters for the pathomorphological evaluation of dysplastic hip arthritis. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 12(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.2.55-61

Issue

Section

Статті