Variability of morphological parameters as a criterion to forecast efficiency of cryopreserved human oocytes.

Authors

  • N. A. Buderatskaya Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Medical Center Institute of genetics reproduction, Ukraine
  • M. P. Petrushko Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Assisted reproductive technology clinic, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.4.18-22

Keywords:

oocyte cryopreservation, vitrification, morphology, pregnancy rate, survival rate

Abstract

Background. Cryopreservation of oocytes becomes increasingly important in the programs of assisted reproductive technologies, as it avoids the ethical and legal problems associated with the cryopreservation of embryos. Objective. The purpose of the work was to study the morphological parameters of the oocytes and their impact on the effectiveness of cryopreservation. Methods. This is a retrospective data analysis of IVF cycles using vitrified oocytes. The 724 mature oocytes with dysmorphism and normal morphology were vitrified using CryoTec by vitrification method. A total of 724 mature oocytes were vitrified. P-level critical value was 0,05. Results It was shown that evaluation and selection of the most promising cell material prior to freezing can be carried out using the qualitative morphological criteria, as there has been revealed the relationship between these criteria and the success of cryopreservation. Qualitative parameters to select the cryoresistant oocytes are as follows: state of the first polar body, Zona pellucida and cytoplasm. The results showed that classification based on oocytes morphology revealed a significant correlation with survival after cryopreservation, fertilization rate and in vitro development of embryos to blastocyst stage. Conclusion. The proposed criteria for assessing the morphofunctional state of oocytes prior to cryopreservation contribute to the effectiveness of the treatment of infertility by means of in vitro fertilization.

References

  1. Derlatkal P, Grabowska-Derlatka L, Jalinik K, Danska-Bidzińska A. [Recurrent ovarian cancer - qualification and results of surgical treatment]. Ginekol Pol. 2015 Dec;86(12):902-6. Polish.
  2. Tomasi-Cont N, Lambertini M, Hulsbosch S, Peccatori AF, Amant F. Strategies for fertility preservation in young early breast cancer patients. Breast. 2014 Oct;23(5):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.05.024.
  3. Beca JP, Lecaros A, Gonzаlez P, Sanhueza P, Mandakovic B. [Medical, ethical and legal issues in cryopreservation of human embryos]. Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jul;142(7):903-8. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000700011. Spanish
  4. Montjean D, Geoffroy-Siraudin C, Gervoise-Boyer M, Tourame P, Boyer P. Morphokinetics analysis of embryos derived from vitrified / warmed oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Nov;32(11):1615-21. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0569-0.
  5. Goltsev AN, editor. [Current problems of cryobiology and cryomedicine]. Kharkiv; 2012. Chapter 2.2, Grishchenko VI, Kopeika EF, Petrushko MP Chub NN, Pinyayev VI, Kramar MI, authors; [Cryopreservation of embryos, reproductive cells and tissues of humans and animals]; p. 337-61. Russian.
  6. Protocol on Embryo Protection A Working Party of the 24th Meeting of the Steering Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe. Stras-bourg. 2003; 44 p.
  7. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Feichtinger O, Tews G. Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000 Feb;15(2):427-30.
  8. Ten J, Mendiola J, Vioque J, de Juan J, Bernabeu R. Donor oocyte dysmorphisms and their influence on fertilization and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Jan;14(1):40-8.
  9. Choi JK, Yue T, Huang H, Zhao G, Zhang M, He X. The crucial role of zona pellucida in cryo-preservation of oocytes by vitrification. Cryobiology. 2015 Oct;71(2):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.08.012.
  10. Kahraman S, Yakin K, Dönmez E, Samli H, Bahçe M, Cengiz G, Sertyel S, Samli M, Imirzalioğlu N. Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracyto-plasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;15(11):2390-3.
  11. Yu EJ, Ahn H, Lee JM, Jee BC, Kim SH. Fertilization and embryo quality of mature oocytes with specific morphological abnormalities. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015 Dec;42(4):156-162. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2015.42.4.156.
  12. Alikani M, Schimmel T, Willadsen SM. Cy-toplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11(5):335-344.
  13. Seet VY, Al-Samerria S, Wong J, Stanger J, Yovich JL, Almahbobi G. Optimising vitrification of human oocytes using multiple cryoprotectants and morphological and functional assessment. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25(6):918-26. doi: 10.1071/RD12136.
  14. Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 May;12(5):608-15.

How to Cite

Buderatskaya, N. A., & Petrushko, M. P. (2016). Variability of morphological parameters as a criterion to forecast efficiency of cryopreserved human oocytes. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 10(4), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2016.4.18-22

Issue

Section

Статті