Optimization of anesthetic management of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Part III: clinical and morphological aspects

Authors

  • S. P. Novikov Dnipropetrovsk City Clinical Hospital №4, Ukraine
  • L. A. Kirillova Dnipropetrovsk City Clinical Hospital №4, Ukraine
  • P. S. Novikova State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’, Ukraine
  • I. V. Tverdokhleb State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-3773

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.1.29-36

Keywords:

colorectal cancer, low-flow anesthesia, combined anesthesia, electron microscopy

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Background. Interest in the study of the properties of sevoflurane, increased in recent years due to its influence on hemodynamics and morphological condition of the respiratory department of lungs, causes advisability of analyzing the structure of organs directly involved in the reactions of radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Objective. The purpose of research is to select the optimal method of anesthesia protection of patients from operating aggression during surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, comparative analysis of tissue and cell ultrastructure in intraoperative biopsies of the colon in the conditions of application of the standard ataralgesia and combined anesthesia with epidural analgesia. Methods. It was performed a comparative analysis of clinical and morphological data and results of treatment using total intravenous anesthesia followed analgesia with opiates analgesics, and combined techniques using low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia and epidural analgesia, followed by prolonged epidural anesthesia. Results. It was shown a significant advantage of combined techniques in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia due to: normodynamic type of hemodynamics during operation, possibility to extubate patient in operating room, effective analgesia in early postoperative period. Methods of prolonged epidural analgesia provided a significant need reduction for opioid analgesics, efficient analgesia in postoperative period, saved anti-tumor immunity and resistance to metastasis in patients with cancer, has provided more early resumption of intestine motor function, reduced terms of patient's staying in the intensive care unit. Implemented methodology reduced the frequency of postoperative mortality, complications, average length of hospital stay and frequency of patient returns to intensive care unit. Combined low-flow sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and epidural analgesia with bupivacaine during radical operations followed by containment of endothelial dysfunction by limiting the destructive and degenerative changes in the endothelial cell organelles, stabilization of membranes, preventing spasm of arterioles, stasis and erythrocyte sludge. Conclusion. Combined techniques of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia and epidural analgesia, followed by prolonged epidural anesthesia is an optimal method of anesthesia protection of patients from operating aggression during surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Methods of epidural analgesia versus opioid analgesia leads to a significant reduction of the phenomena of infiltration, perivascular and interstitial edema in the composition of the intestinal wall in the area of surgical procedure..

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014-2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2014. 32 p.
  2. [Bulletin of national cancer registry of Ukraine 2015]. Vol. 16. Ukrainian.
  3. Ovechkin AM, Sviridov SV. [Post-operative pain and pain management: state of the art]. Emergency medicine. 2011;6:20-31. Russian.
  4. Lennon FE, Moss J, Singleton PA. The μ-opioid receptor in cancer progression: is there a direct effect? Anesthesiology. 2012;116(4):940-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824b9512.
  5. Mathew B, Lennon FE, Siegler J, Mirzapoiazova T, Mambetsariev N, Sammani S, Gerhold LM, LaRiviere PJ, Chen CT, Garcia JG, Salgia R, Moss J, Singleton PA. The novel role of the mu opioid receptor in lung cancer progression: a laboratory investigation. Anesth. Analg. 2011;112(3):558-67. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820568af.
  6. Shavit Y, Lewis JW, Terman GW, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Opioid peptides mediate the suppressive effect of stress on natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Science. 1984;223(4632):188-90.
  8. Cata JP, Gottumukkala V, Thakar D, Keerty D, Gebhardt R, Liu DD. Effects of postoperative epidural analgesia on recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Anesth. 2014;26(1):3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.06.007. PMID: 24095887.
  9. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493. PMID: 11118174.
  10. Biki B, Mascha E, Moriarty DC, Fitzpatrick JM, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ. Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recur-rence: a retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(2):180-7. doi: 10.1097/ ALN.0b013e31817f5b73. PMID: 18648226.
  11. Likhvantsev VV, Kozlova EM, Fedorov SA, Mironenko AV, Selivanov DD. [The minimum alveolar concentration for respiratory depression sevofluran]. General Reanimatology. 2011;7(3):56-58. Russian.
  12. Golubev AM, Moroz VV Meshcheryakov GN Lysenko DV. [Pathogenesis and morphology of acute lung injury]. General reanimatology. 2005;1(5):5-12. Russian.
  13. Moroz VV, Golubev AM. [Principles in the diagnosis of early manifestations of acute lung lesion]. General reanimatology. 2006;2(4):5-7. Russian.
  14. Fratila ОС, Ilias T, Maghiar TT, Puscasiu M, Puscasiu D. Ultrastructural aspects of the colonic epithelium in ulcerative colitis. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad. 2008;18:215-8.
  15. Shaprinsky EV. [The dynamics of ultra-structural changes of ileal cells after ligation of right colic artery]. Ukrainian Journal of Surgery. 2014;2(25):14-9. Russian.
  16. Mironov AA, Komissarchik YuYa, Mironov VA. Metodyi elektronnoy mikroskopii v biologii i meditsine: Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. [Electron microscopy methods in biology and medicine : Methodological Guide]. St. Petersburg: Science; 1994. 400 p. Russian.
  17. Kuo J. Electron microscopy: methods and protocols. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc. 2007. 608 p.
  18. Mishalov VD, Chaikovsky JuB, Tverdokhleb IV. [About legal, legislative, ethical standards and requirements at performance scientific morphological researches]. Morphologia. 2007;1(2):108-15. Ukrainian.
  19. Mishalov VD, Tverdokhlib IV, Yurchenko VT. [Legal and legislative study of biological objects be withdrawn from human corpse for scientific research in anatomy, histology, cytology]. Morpho-logia. 2016;10(1):107-11. Ukrainian.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Novikov, S. P., Kirillova, L. A., Novikova, P. S., & Tverdokhleb, I. V. (2018). Optimization of anesthetic management of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Part III: clinical and morphological aspects. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 12(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.1.29-36

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Статті

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Morphologia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the Journal the right to the first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which allows other people to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
        By submitting a manuscript to the editorial office of the Journal ‘Morphologia’ authors agree to transfer the rights to protect and use the manuscript (all supplemental materials, particularly protected objects such as photos, drawings, diagrams, tables, etc.), including the reproduction in the press and distribution via the Internet; translation of the manuscript into any language; export and import of journal copies with the Authors’ article in order to make it available for public. Authors convey the rights mentioned above to the editorial office without any temporal or territorial limitation all over the world. 
        The Authors guarantee that they have the exclusive rights to use the material transferred to editorial office. Editors are not responsible to third parties for contraventions of warranty given by the Authors. The considered rights are transferred to the editorial office since the moment when the current issue is signed for publishing. Reproduction of materials published in the Journal by other individuals and legal entities is possible only with the consent of Editorial office, with the obligatory indication of the full bibliographic reference of the primary publication. The Authors reserve the right to use the published material, its fragments and parts for teaching materials, oral presentations, dissertation thesis prepararion with obligatory bibliographic citation of the original paper. Electron copy of the published article, downloaded from official journal web-site in .pdf format may be put by authors on the official web-site of their institutions, any other official resources with open access.