Morphological features of combat wound healing under vacuum assistance wound therapy

Authors

  • O. Y. Loskutov State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’,
  • O. M. Goreglyad State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’,
  • O. O. Bondarenko State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-9219
  • N. S. Bondarenko State Institution ‘Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine’,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.1.20-28

Keywords:

combat wound, VAC, wound healing, myofybroblast, CD34

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Background. Complex severe wounds require enormous efforts in their treatment. Negative pressure wound
therapy, or vacuum assistance wound closure (VAC), is a promising method of accelerated wound healing. However, its efficacy
needs to be approved and explained. Objective. Histological, immunohistochemical and electron microscopy assessment
of wound healing under negative pressure comparing with conventional wound cure. Methods. Histological, immunohistochemical,
electron microscopy and morphometric evaluation of specimens from wound bed at admission of patients, 3
and 7 days of treatment. The morphometric analysis was performed using the ImageJ image analysis software. Results. Morphological
evaluation demonstrated reduction of inflammatory infiltration, advance in wound re-epithelisation and support of
negative pressure wound therapy in collagen matrix remodeling due to early proliferation of fibroblasts, elevated collagen
production and myofibroblasts differentiation. Immunohistochemical labeling of vascular endothelial marker CD34 revealed
significantly enhanced angiogenesis in the wound that occurs as formation of more developed and functioning microvessels
on day 3 of negative pressure wound therapy comparing to control group and its reduction on 7 day of treatment.
Conclusion. Vacuum assistance wound closure is a more effective method of severe combat wounds healing, than application
of gauze bandages. Negative pressure wound therapy benefits a wound repair by enhancing angiogenesis, diminishing
inflammation, and contributing to early connective tissue development.

References

  1. Naumenko LY, Horehliad OM, Mamet’ev AA, Kostrica KY. [Role of VAC in treatment of open severe polystructural damage of extremities]. Trauma. 2016; 17 (3): 25-26. Ukrainian.
  2. Naumenko L, Horehliad O, Mametyev A, Kostrytcya K, Domansky A, [Healing of severe pol-ystructural limb wounds using vacuum therapy]. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics. 2017; 4: DOI: https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872017457-61. Ukrainian.
  3. Jones SM, Banwell SM, Shakespeare PG. Advances in wound healing: topical negative pres-sure therapy. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2005; 81 (956): 353–357.
  4. Tintle SM, Gwinn DE, Andersen RC, Kumar AR. Soft tissue coverage of combat wounds. Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics Advances. 2010; 19(1):29–34.
  5. Hunt TK, author; Barbul A, Caldwell MD, Eaglstein WH, editors. Vascular factors govern heal-ing in chronic wounds. In: Clinical and Experimental Approach to Dermal and Epidermal Repair: Normal and Chronic Wounds. New York: Wiley & Leiss;1991. pp. 1–17.
  6. Pierce GF, Vande Berg J, Rudolph R, Tarpley J, Mustoe TA. Platelet-derived growth fac-tor-BB and transforming growth factor beta1 selec-tively modulate glycosaminoglycans, collagen, and myofibroblasts in excisional wounds. American Journal of Pathology. 1991; 138 (3): 629–646.
  7. Cohen K, Diegelmann RF, Lindblad WJ, au-thors. Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992.
  8. Werner S, Krieg T, Smola H. Keratinocyte–Fibroblast Interactions in Wound Healing. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2007; 127: 998–1008.
  9. Eyden B. The myofibroblast, electron mi-croscopy and cancer research. Int. J. Cancer. 2009; 125: 1743–1745.
  10. Laiho M, Keski OJ. Growth factors in the regulation of pericellular proteolysis: a review. Cancer Research. 1989; 49 (10): 2533–2553.
  11. Whitby DJ, Ferguson MJ, authors; Adzick NS, Longaker MT, editors. Immunohistological studies of the extracellular matrix and soluble growth factors in fetal and adult wound healing. In: Fetal Wound Healing. New York: Elsevier Science; 1992. pp. 161–177.
  12. Li T, Zhang L, Han LI. Early application of negative pressure wound therapy to acute wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus: an effective approach to preventing biofilm formation. Experimental Therapeutic Medicine. 2016;11:769–776.
  13. Jacobs S, Simhaee DA, Marsano A. Effica-cy and mechanisms of vacuum- assisted closure (VAC) therapy in promoting wound healing: a ro-dent model. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery. 2009;62:1331–1338.

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Loskutov, O. Y., Goreglyad, O. M., Bondarenko, O. O., & Bondarenko, N. S. (2018). Morphological features of combat wound healing under vacuum assistance wound therapy. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 12(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2018.1.20-28

Issue

Section

Статті