Efficiency analysis of the improved method for the assessment of morphological stage of tooth development by the rentgenological signs

Authors

  • M. Y. Goncharuk-Khomyn Uzhhorod National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2017.4.28-34

Keywords:

dental status, dental age, forensic expertise

Abstract

Background. Taking into account the specificity of the tooth-jaw apparatus formation, in a series of previous studies it was noted that even though odontogenesis is influenced by factors of the external and internal environment, however, critical changes in the structure of the teeth germs are observed much lesser than in other systems and organs that are more vulnerable to the influence of different factors. This particular feature is one of the reasons that explains the widespread use of odontological status data in forensic medicine and forensic dental practice not only in order to realize the processes of comparative and reconstructive identification, but more often in order to estimate the age of a person by the stage of tooth formation and eruption. Objective. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficiency of the improved method for graphic comparison of the radiological signs of tooth morphological development with samples of the reference system. Methods. An analysis of the effectiveness for the improved approach and the method for determining the age with Demirjian technique was performed on 116 orthopantomograms selected from the already pre-existing database of X-ray images of patients aged 6-16 years at the University Dental Clinic (Uzhhorod National University). Each image was segmented to the field of interest which includes research objects and then anonymized with keeping only age-related data, and therefore, age-related data was categorized into groups using a table editor. Improvement of comparison process of teeth digital images with reference samples was provided by the primary segmentation of orthopantomograms and unification of their quality parameters with the standardization of the area of interest and plane orientation, then images were going through the contrasting and contouring processes and further adaptation of the dimensional parameters of the object to those similar in the referencing system. Results. An improved method for evaluating the morphological stage of tooth development by radiological signs involves the steps of digital images segmentation, unification the parameters of their quality and orientation, and the further superimposition of comparative and reference objects in the software. The proposed method of comparing the results obtained during the X-ray diagnosis of the tooth-jaw apparatus with the data of the reference system developed by Demirjian allows to reduce the level of the average absolute error of the dental age definition for 9,09-48,8% in different age groups, thus limiting the mismatch between the dental and chronological age range to 0,11-0,55 years. Conclusion. During the analysis of the dental age evaluation methods that are used in forensic dentistry, it was found that approaches aimed at verifying the stages of individual tooth development provide more accurate results than the approaches aimed to categorize development stage of tooth-jaw apparatus in general. In addition, such techniques limit the influence outcomes of local and general factors for the interpretation of end results, as these factors can provoke variations in terms of forming and eruption of teeth. The use of the developed methodology also significantly reduces the time and cost associated with the implementation of the dental identification stage and the selection of relevant morphological criteria as significant elements for the reconstruction and comparison of anthropometric and radiological profiles of victims of mass casualties, refugees or missing persons.

References

  1. Madan K, Baliga S, Thosar N, Rathi N. Recent advances in dental radiography for pediatric patients: a review. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2015;1(2):21-5. DOI: 10.15713/ins.jmrps.11
  2. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RK, Lurie AG, Douglass JM, Farman A. G, Zeller GG. The Image Gently in Dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentis-try for children. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2014;118(3):257-61. DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.001
  3. Wang J, Feng JQ. Signaling pathways critical for tooth root formation. Journal of Dental Research. 2017;96(11):1221-8. DOI:10.1177/0022034517717478
  4. Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Australian dental journal. 2014:59(1):131-42. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12160
  5. Focardi M, Pinchi V, De Luca F, Norelli GA. Age estimation for forensic purposes in Italy: ethical issues. International journal of legal medicine. 2014;128(3):515-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-0986-0
  6. Ambarkova V, Galić I, Vodanović M, Biočina-Lukenda D, Brkić H. Dental age estimation using Demirjian and Willems methods: cross sec-tional study on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Forensic science international. 2014;234:187-e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.024
  7. Aissaoui A, Salem NH, Mougou M, Maatouk F, Chadly A. Dental age assessment among Tunisian children using the Demirjian method. Journal of forensic dental sciences. 2016;8(1):47. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.176956
  8. Yusof MYPM, Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G. Dental age estimation in Malay children based on all permanent teeth types. International journal of legal medicine. 2014;128(2):329-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0825-8
  9. Priyadarshini C, Puranik, MP, Uma SR. Dental age estimation methods: A review. Int J Adv Health Sci. 2015;1(12):19-25.
  10. Vidisdottir SR, Richter S. Age estimation by dental developmental stages in children and adolescents in Iceland. Forensic science international. 2015;257:518-e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.007
  11. Olivares JI, Aguilera IA, Badal JV, De Luca S, López MCB. Evaluation of the maximum length of deciduous teeth for estimation of the age of infants and young children: proposal of new regression formulas. International journal of legal medicine. 2014:345-352. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0903-y
  12. Lucas VS, McDonald F, Andiappan M, Roberts G. Dental Age Estimation—Root Pulp Visi-bility (RPV) patterns: A reliable Mandibular Maturity Marker at the 18 year threshold. Forensic science international. 2017;270:98-102. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.004
  13. AlQahtani SJ, Hector MP, Liversidge HM. Accuracy of dental age estimation charts: Schour and Massler, Ubelaker and the London Atlas. American journal of physical anthropology. 2014;154(1):70-8. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22473
  14. Skanchy TL, Maness H, Al Dayeh A, Harris EF. A Comparison of Two Dental Age Estimation Techniques in Contemporary American Whites: The Moorrees and Demirjian Approaches. Int J Forensic Sci Pathol. 2016:4(5):243-8. DOI: 10.19070/2332-287X-1600058
  15. Zapico SC, Ubelaker DH. Applications of physiological bases of ageing to forensic sciences. Estimation of age-at-death. Ageing research reviews. 2013;12(2):605-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.02.002
  16. Kumar R, Athota A, Rastogi T, Karumuri SK. Forensic radiology: An emerging tool in identification. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology. 2015;27(3):416. DOI: 10.4103/0972-1363.170478
  17. Nur B, Kusgoz A., Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kayipmaz S, Yildirim S. Validity of Demirjian and Nolla methods for dental age estimation for Northeastern Turkish children aged 5–16 years old. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2012;17(5):e871. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.154216
  18. Jayaraman J, Wong HM, King NM, Roberts GJ. The French–Canadian data set of Demirjian for dental age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2013;20(5):373-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.015
  19. Cameriere R, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Polimeni A, Federici F, Cingolani M, Ferrante L. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth with Bayesian calibration approach. Forensic science international. 2016;258:50-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.11.005
  20. Goncharuk-Khomyn MY, Kostenko YY. [Clinical and experimrntal study for improving methods of determining the age of adults by dental status]. Morphologia. 2013;7(1):85-8. Ukrainian.
  21. Kostenko YY, Mishalov VD, Slyvka MM, Goncahruk-Khomyn MY. [Clinical and Experimental Study of Forensic Dental Status Classification]. Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2013;4(1):361-4. Ukrainian.
  22. Mishalov VD, Kostenko YY, Goncharuk-Khomyn MY, Voychenko VV. [System DVI Interpol and specialized PLASS DATA software incut of international cooperation and postgraduate education of specialists on authentication of personality]. Forensic medical expertise. 2016;1:8-15. Ukrainian.
  23. Kostenko YY, Goncharuk-Khomyn MY. [Comparative characteristic of age determination techniques in adults by dental status]. Coliection of scientific works of staff member of P. L. Shupyk NMAPE. 2013; 22 (3):384-390. Ukrainian.
  24. Kostenko Y, Goncharuk-Khomyn M. Possibility of improving method of age determination during pathological attrition. The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology. 2013;31:67-8.

Published

2017-12-22

How to Cite

Goncharuk-Khomyn, M. Y. (2017). Efficiency analysis of the improved method for the assessment of morphological stage of tooth development by the rentgenological signs. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 11(4), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2017.4.28-34

Issue

Section

Статті