A simple device for microinjections, manipulations and measurements using an electromorphological chip under mi-crointerferometric control of the interface and membrane processes at the thickness range of 5-1000 nm at different angles

Authors

  • O. V. Gradov Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS. V.L. Talroze Laboratory of biological effects of nanostructures, Russian Federation
  • F. A. Nasirov Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS. V.L. Talroze Laboratory of biological effects of nanostructures, Russian Federation
  • A. A. Skrynnik Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS. V.L. Talroze Laboratory of biological effects of nanostructures, Russian Federation
  • A. G. Jablokov Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS. V.L. Talroze Laboratory of biological effects of nanostructures, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2017.4.7-17

Keywords:

Microelectrodes, microinterferometer, microperfusion, patch-clamp, micromanipulation, single cell perfusion, cytoelectrophysio-logical chip

Abstract

Micromanipulations, perfusions and measurements performed using glass microelectrodes filled with an electrolyte is a conventional technique for experimental morphological and membrane electrophysiological studies at a single cell and membrane surface level. The typical (effective) diameter of the end of the glass microelectrode is from 500 up to less than 100 nm, which prevents one from observing it using a standard optical microscope in accordance with the optical resolution criteria, since the diameter less than 500 nm is indistinguishable within the interference zone. Microprocessor programming of the puller (microforge) that provides pulling and tearing allows to obtain in certain regimes the adjusted diameter and shape of the micropipette tip, although this result is not fully controlled due to the above limitations. In this connection it is necessary to design the control devices for the micropipette tips both at the preparation and operation stages (intracellular or extracellular insertion). This method also should provide visualization of the processes occurring upon interaction of the microelectrode tip with the cell in real time, depending on the electrode type and state, which allows to level the artifacts arising with the systematic error frequency from the uncontrolled operation of the micropipette tip after different ways of the microelectrode filling with the electrolyte. We propose an installation scheme that solves the above problems by means of introducing an interferometric device for microscopic control of the microelectrode and micromanipulator or microperfusor, for the first time for a given type of optical instruments combined with the interferometric optical scheme.

References

  1. Scarpelli EM, Mautone AJ. Surface biophysics of the surface monolayer theory is incompatible with regional lung function. Biophysical journal. 1994;67(3):1080-9. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80573-9
  2. Rutishauser U. Polysialic acid at the cell surface: biophysics in service of cell interactions and tissue plasticity. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 1998;70(3):304-12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19980901)70:3<304::AID-JCB3>3.0.CO;2-R
  3. Beales PA. Biophysics: A toehold in cell surface dynamics. Nature Nanotechnology. 2017;12:404–6. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.20
  4. Longsworth LG. Experimental Tests of an Interference Method for the Study of Diffusion. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1947;69(10):2510-6. doi: 10.1021/ja01202a077
  5. Kegeles G, Gosting LJ. The theory of an interference method for the study of diffusion. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1947;69(10):2516-23. doi: 10.1021/ja01202a078
  6. Gosting LJ, Hanson EM, Kegeles G., Morris MS. Equipment and experimental methods for inter-ference diffusion studies. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1949;20(3):209-15. doi: 10.1063/1.1741490
  7. Gosting LJ, Morris MS. Diffusion studies on dilute aqueous sucrose solutions at 1 and 25 with the Gouy interference method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1949;71(6):1998-2006. doi: 10.1021/ja01174a028
  8. Longsworth LG. Tests of Flowing Junction Diffusion Cells with Interference Methods. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1950;21(6):524-8. doi: 10.1063/1.1745641
  9. Gosting LJ, Akeley DF. A Study of the Diffusion of Urea in Water at 25° with the Gouy Interference Method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1952;74(8):2058-60. doi: 10.1021/ja01128a060
  10. Lyons MS, Thomas JV. Diffusion Studies on Dilute Aqueous Glycine Solutions at 1 and 25° with the Gouy Interference Method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1950;72(10):4506-11. doi: 10.1021/ja01166a047
  11. Lyons PA, Sandquist CL. A study of the diffusion of n-butyl alcohol in water using the Gouy interference method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1953;75(16):3896-9. doi: 10.1021/ja01112a007
  12. Gosting LJ, Onsager L. A general theory for the Gouy diffusion method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1952;74(23):6066-74. doi: 10.1021/ja01143a071
  13. Chatterjee A. Diffusion Studies of Bovine Plasma Albumin at 25° with the Help of Jamin Interference Optics. Journal of the American Chemical Society.1964;86(18):3640-2. doi: 10.1021/ja01072a010
  14. Chatterjee A. Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sucrose in very dilute aqueous solutions using Jamin interference optics at 25. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1964;86(5):793-5. doi: 10.1021/ja01059a009
  15. Gueudré L, Binder T, Chmelik C, Hibbe F, Ruthven DM, Kärger J. Micro-imaging by interference microscopy: A case study of orientation-dependent guest diffusion in MFI-type zeolite host crystals. Materials. 2012;5(4):721-40. doi: 10.3390/ma5040721
  16. Kärger J, Schemmert ULF., Vasenkov S. Application of interference microscopy – a novel route to study intracrystalline zeolitic diffusion. Adsorption Science and Technology: Proceedings of the Second Pacific Basin Conference on Adsorption Science and Technology: Brisbane, Australia, 14-18 May 2000. World Scientific, 2000:324. doi: 10.1142/9789812793331_0065.
  17. Heinke L, Kortunov P, Tzoulaki D, Castro M, Wright PA, Kärger J. Three-dimensional diffusion in nanoporous hostguest materials monitored by interference microscopy. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2007;81(2):26002. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/81/26002
  18. Gueudré L, Chmelik C, Kärger J. Diffusion anisotropy in a single crystal of silicalite-1 studied by interference microscopy. Diffusion Fundamentals. 2011;16:45.1-45.2
  19. Heinke L, Kortunov P, Tzoulaki D, Kärger J. The options of interference microscopy to explore the significance of intracrystalline diffusion and surface permeation for overall mass transfer on na-noporous materials. Adsorption. 2007;13(3-4):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s10450-007-9048-y
  20. Karge HG, Kärger J. Application of IR spectroscopy, IR microscopy, and optical interference microscopy to diffusion in zeolites. Adsorption and Diffusion. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008:135-206.
  21. Schemmert U, Kärger J, Weitkamp J. Interference microscopy as a technique for directly measuring intracrystalline transport diffusion in zeolites. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 1999;32(1):101-10. doi: 10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00095-5
  22. Geier O, Vasenkov S, Lehmann E, Kärger J, Rakoczy RA, Weitkamp J. 19-O-04-Interference microscopy as a tool of choice for investigating the role of crystal morphology in diffusion studies. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2001;135:154. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2991(01)81257-X
  23. Kärger J, Heinke L, Kortunov P, Vasenkov S. Looking into the crystallites: diffusion studies by interference microscopy. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2007;170:739-47. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80915-3
  24. Lauerer A, Binder T, Haase J, Kärger J, Ruthven D.M. Diffusion of propene in DDR crystals studied by interference microscopy. Chemical Engi-neering Science. 2015;138:110-17.
  25. Beran PŘE, Vojáčková S, Porsch B. Determination of the diffusion coefficients of T1+, As 3+, phenol, and quinolin-8-ol using the polarized light interference method. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1975;22:908a. doi: 10.1039/C3975000908A
  26. Holmes DE, Gatos HC. Convective Interference and “Effective” Diffusion-Controlled Segregation during Directional Solidification under Stabilizing Vertical Thermal Gradients; Ge. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 1981;128(2):429-37.
  27. Brudney N, Saunders L. A study by the Gouy interference method of the diffusion in water of potassium laurate. Journal of the Chemical Society. 1955:2916-21. doi: 10.1039/JR9550002916
  28. Pierobon M, Akyildiz IF. A statistical–physical model of interference in diffusion-based molecular nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on communications. 2014;62(6):2085-95. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2014.2314650
  29. Chertkov VG, Chalykh AY. Polarization-interference micromethod for the study of mutual diffusion in polymer systems. Polymer Bulletin. 1988;19(5):487-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00263919
  30. Kozenkov VM, Belyaev VV, Tumovskii GD, Spakhov AA. Translational and Rotation Self-Diffusion in Polymeric Systems Including Photo-and Thermo-Polymerized Systems by an Interference-Holography Method and a Method of Photo-Induced Optical Anisotropy //Reaction Kinetics in Condensed Matter RKCM’10-Moscow:128. doi: 10.1.1.456.9766. Russian.
  31. Taylor CV. The contractile vacuole in Euplotes: An example of the solgel reversibility of cytoplasm. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology. 1923;37(3):259-89. doi: 10.1002/jez.1400370302
  32. Bensley RR. Plasmosin. The geland fiber-forming constituent of the protoplasm of the hepatic cell. The Anatomical Record. 1938;72(3):351-69. doi: 10.1002/ar.1090720308
  33. Seifriz W. Solgel transformation of protoplasm. Revue d'hematologie. 1949;5(5-6):591-602.
  34. Reiner JM. A proposed mechanism for the solgel transformations. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1965;27(1):105-112. doi: 10.1007/BF02477266
  35. Munder MC, Midtvedt D, Franzmann TM, Nueske E, Malinovska L, Otto O. A solgel transition of the cytoplasm driven by adaptive intracellular pH changes promotes entry into dormancy. Molecular Biology Of The Cell. 2015;26:8120.
  36. Kondo H. Ultrastructural consideration on the nature, sol and gel, of the aqueous cytoplasm in embedment-free section electron microscopy. Ad-vances in colloid and interface science. 2010;160(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.07.003
  37. Martínez-Cancino R, Sotero RC. Modeling the effect of cytoplasm solgel transitions on magnetization changes during MRI diffusion experi-ments in brain gray matter // International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism. 2008;10(4):269-80.
  38. Lewin RA. Sol-to-gel changes in the proto-plasm of prokaryotic algae. Algological Studies / Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 1994;1:67-71.
  39. Janmey PA. Gelsol transition of the cytoplasm and its regulation. AIP Conference Proceed-ings. 1991;226(1):304-25. doi: 10.1063/1.40599
  40. Luby-Phelps K. The Cytoplasm of Living Cells as a Reversible Gel Network. Physical Networks: Polymers and gels. 1990:345 p.
  41. Nilsson L. Å. Qualitative analysis of acute phase protein antisera with the comparative interference diffusion-in-gel technique. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 1968;33(1):16-28.
  42. Koyuncu I, Brant J, Lüttge A, Wiesner MR. A comparison of vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) for characterizing membrane surface topography. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;278(1):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.039
  43. Farinas J, Verkman AS. Cell volume and plasma membrane osmotic water permeability in epithelial cell layers measured by interferometry. Biophysical journal. 1996;71(6):3511-22. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79546-2
  44. Haruna M, Yoden K, Ohmi M, Seiyama A. Detection of phase transition of a biological membrane by precise refractive-index measurement based on the low coherence interferometry. Proc. SPIE. 2000;3915:188-93. doi: 10.1117/12.384155
  45. Honglin M, Zhihao Q. [Stretching Deformation Analysis of Biology Membrane Material by Interferometry Phaseshift Method]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition). 2009;32(03):42-6. Chinese.
  46. Zilker A, Engelhardt H, Sackmann E. Dynamic reflection interference contrast (RIC-) microscopy: a new method to study surface excitations of cells and to measure membrane bending elastic moduli. Journal De Physique. 1987;48(12):2139-51. doi: 10.1051/jphys:0198700480120213900
  47. Lambacher A, Fromherz P. Orientation of hemicyanine dye in lipid membrane measured by fluorescence interferometry on a silicon chip. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2001;105(2):343-6. doi: 10.1021/jp002843i
  48. Chupa JA, McCauley JP, Strongin RM, Smith AB, Blasie JK, Peticolas LJ, Bean JC. Vecto-rially oriented membrane protein monolayers: profile structures via X-ray interferometry/holography. Biophysical journal. 1994;67(1):336-48. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80486-2
  49. Gupta S, Dura JA, Freites JA, Tobias DJ, Blasie JK. Structural characterization of the voltage-sensor domain and voltage-gated K+-channel proteins vectorially oriented within a single bilayer membrane at the solid/vapor and solid/liquid interfaces via neutron interferometry. Langmuir. 2012;28(28):10504-20. doi: 10.1021/la301219z
  50. Izzard CS, Lochner LR. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. Journal of cell science. 1976;21(1):129-59.
  51. Baksh MM, Kussrow AK, Mileni M, Finn MG, Bornhop DJ. Label-free quantification of membrane-ligand interactions using backscattering interferometry. Nature biotechnology. 2011;29(4):357-60. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1790
  52. Baksh MM, Lockwood A, Richards C, Finn MG, Heidary D. Label-Free Molecular Observations of Membrane-Associated Species using Backscatter-ing Interferometry. Biophysical Journal. 2015;108(2):617a.
  53. Gerhart J, Haddad-Weiser G, Kussrow A, Bornhop D, Flowers R, Thévenin D. Backscattering Interferometry: Seeing Membrane Proteins in a New Light. Biophysical Journal. 2015;108(2):253a.
  54. Payne JA, Lee TH, Anderson MA, Aguilar MI. Examination of the Interaction between a Membrane Active Peptide and Artificial Bilayers by Dual Polarisation Interferometry. Bioprotocol. 2017;7(1):e2087. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2087
  55. Hirn R, Bayerl TM, Rädler JO, Sackmann E. Collective membrane motions of high and low amplitude, studied by dynamic light scattering and micro-interferometry. Faraday discussions. 1999;111:17-30. doi: 10.1039/A807883A
  56. Dana KJ. Three dimensional reconstruction of the tectorial membrane: an image processing method using Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). MIT, 1992, 96 p.
  57. Barroca T, Bon P, Lévêque-Fort S, Fort E. Supercritical self-interference fluorescence microscopy for full-field membrane imaging. Proc. SPIE. 2013:858911. doi: 10.1117/12.2003736
  58. Gandorfer A, Scheler R, Schumann R, Haritoglou C, Kampik A. Interference microscopy delineates cellular proliferations on flat mounted internal limiting membrane specimens. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(1):120-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.146514
  59. Erokhova LA, Novikov SM, Lazarev GL, Kazakova TA, Orlov DA, Indukaev KV, Maksimov GV. [Study of regular intracellular and membrane processes in neurons by laser interference microscopy]. Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine. 2005;140(2):262-4. doi: 10.1007/s10517-005-0461-5. Russian.
  60. Wilson AD. Inplane displacement of a stressed membrane with a hole measured by holographic interferometry. Applied optics. 1971;10(4):908-12. doi: 10.1364/AO.10.000908
  61. Röhler R, Sieger C. Analysis of asymmetrical membrane vibrations by holographic interferometry. Optics Communications. 1978.25(3):297-300. doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(78)90132-3
  62. Ghislain LP, Webb WW. Force and membrane compliance measurements using laser interferometry and optical trapping. Proc. SPIE (Holography, Interferometry, and Optical Pattern Recognition in Biomedicine III). 1993;1889:212-4. doi: 10.1117/12.155726
  63. Cheung DCL, Barnes TH, Haskell TG. Feedback interferometry with membrane mirror for adaptive optics. Optics communications. 2003;218(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(03)01188-X
  64. Kaizuka Y, Groves JT. Hydrodynamic damping of membrane thermal fluctuations near surfaces imaged by fluorescence interference microscopy. Physical review letters. 2006;96(11):118101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.118101
  65. Eom J, Park SJ, Lee BH. Noncontact photoacoustic tomography of in vivo chicken chorioallantoic membrane based on all-fiber heterodyne interferometry. Journal of biomedical optics. 2015;20(10):106007. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.10.106007
  66. Pande P, Shelton RL, Monroy GL, Nolan RM, Boppart SA. A mosaicking approach for in vivo thickness mapping of the human tympanic membrane using low coherence interferometry.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2016;17(5):403-16. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0576-6
  67. Hernandez-Montes MDS, Santoyo FM, Munoz S, Perez C, de la Torre M, Flores M, Alvarez, L. Surface strainfield determination of tympanic membrane using 3D-digital holographic interferometry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2015;71:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.03.008
  68. Kimura Y. [Experimental study of the vibration analysis of tympanic membrane by holographic interferometry]. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1981;84(8):880-9. Japan.
  69. del Socorro Hernández-Montes M, Solis SM, Santoyo FM. 3-D Digital holographic interferometry as a tool to measure the tympanic membrane motion. Proc. SPIE. 2012;8413:A-1-A-6. doi: 10.1117/12.978227
  70. O'Neill MP, Bearden A. The amplitude and phase of basilar membrane motion in the turtle measured with laser-feedback interferometry. Bio-physics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems. World Scien-tific Singapore, 1993;398-405.
  71. Watanabe H, Kysar JW, Lalwani AK.. Microanatomic analysis of the round window membrane by white light interferometry and microcomputed tomography for mechanical amplification. Otology & Neurotology. 2014;35(4):672-8.
  72. King-Smith P, Fink BA, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK, Hill RM, Markakis GA. In vivo Measurement of the Thickness of Human Corneal Endothelium and Descemet's Membrane Using Interferometry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2002;43(13):157.
  73. O'Brien RN, Zhao B. A new optical liquid membrane study technique: I. Use of holographic interferometry to obtain the refractive index of liquid membrane components. Journal of membrane science. 1984;20(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82006-2
  74. Levy D, Weiser K. Use of a laser beam in-terference technique for the determination of the minority carrier diffusion length in layers of a p-n junction. Applied physics letters. 1995;66(14):1788-90. doi: 10.1063/1.113322
  75. Kim H, Patel BS, Kegeles G. Interference optical studies of restricted diffusion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1962;66(10):1960-6. doi: 10.1021/j100816a035
  76. Marucci M, Pettersson SG, Ragnarsson G, Axelsson A. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a membrane by electronic speckle pattern interferometry: a new method and a temperature sensitivity study. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2007;40(9):2870-80. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/9/031
  77. Hook L, Davis WW, Kotin L. High-Speed Calculation of Diffusion Coefficients from Rayleigh Interference Fringes. Applied Optics. 1963;2(1):65-6. doi: 10.1364/AO.2.000066
  78. Seufert WD, O'Brien RN. Determination of diffusion coefficients from the progression of interference fringes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1984;88(5):829-32. doi: 10.1021/j150649a001
  79. He M, Guo Y, Zhong Q, Zhang Y. A New Method of Processing Mach–Zehnder Interference Fringe Data in Determination of Diffusion Coefficient. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2009;30(6):1823-37. doi: 10.1007/s10765-009-0685-0
  80. Vasil'eva VI, Shaposhnik VA, Grigorchuk OV, Petrunya IP. The membrane–solution interface under high-performance current regimes of electrodialysis by means of laser interferometry. Desalination. 2006;192(1-3):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.055
  81. Mahlab D, Yosef NB, Belfort G. Intrinsic membrane compaction and aqueous solute studies of hyperfiltration (reverse-osmosis) membranes using interferometry. ACS Symposium Series 1981;153:147–58 doi: 10.1021/bk-1981-0153.ch010
  82. Fernández-Sempere J, Ruiz-Beviá F, Salcedo-Díaz R, García-Algado P. Diffusion studies in polarized reverse osmosis processes by holographic interferometry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2008;46(12):877-87. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.02.004
  83. Fernández-Sempere J, Ruiz-Beviá F, Salcedo-Díaz R, Garcia-Algado P. Measurement of concentration profiles by holographic interferometry and modelling in unstirred batch reverse osmosis. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2006;45(21):7219-31. doi: 10.1021/ie060417z
  84. Fernández-Sempere J, Ruiz-Beviá F, García-Algado P, Salcedo-Díaz R. Experimental study of concentration polarization in a crossflow reverse osmosis system using Digital Holographic Interfer-ometry. Desalination. 2010;257(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.010
  85. Fernández-Sempere J, Ruiz-Beviá F, Salcedo-Díaz R, García-Algado P. Buoyancy effects in deadend reverse osmosis: visualization by holographic interferometry. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2007;46(6):1794-802. doi: 10.1021/ie061433z
  86. Fernández Sempere J. et al. Visualization by digital holographic interferometry of flux velocity effect in cross-flow reverse osmosis. Póster presentado en 11th Mediterranean Congress of Chemical Engineering, Barcelona, October 21-24, 2008. http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/15257
  87. Xu Q, Tian W, You Z, Xiao J. Multiple beam interference model for measuring parameters of a capillary. Applied optics. 2015;54(22):6948-54. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.006948
  88. Zhang Y, Xu M, Tian W, Xu Q, Xiao J. Analysis of three-dimensional interference patterns of an inclined capillary. Applied optics. 2016;55(22):5936-44. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.005936
  89. Rosenwald SE, Nowall WB, Dontha N, Kuhr WG. Laser interference pattern ablation of a carbon fiber microelectrode: Biosensor signal enhancement after enzyme attachment. Analytical chemistry. 2000;72(20):4914-20.
  90. Qi SW, Liu AP, Lu HG. Research on the method of measurement of nonlinear refractive index of optical materials by interference of capillary. Advanced Materials Research. 2012;490:3468-71. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.490-495.3468
  91. Qi S, Liu Y, Yang X, Xu T, Chen G, Zhang C, Tian J. Measurement of nonlinear refractive index of ethyl red by interference of capillary. Optics Communications. 2008;281(23):5902-4. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.08.044
  92. Nisi H. Measurement of Capillary Constants of Viscous Liquids by Means of Interference Fringes. Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series. 1919;1(3):40-2. doi: 10.11429/ppmsj1919.1.3_40
  93. Kubota M. Interference effects in a capillary arc excitation source for emission spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1978;96(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)93395-1
  94. Deng Y, Li B. Oncolumn refractive-index detection based on retroreflected beam interference for capillary electrophoresis. Applied optics. 1998;37(6):998-1005. doi: 10.1364/AO.37.000998
  95. Jicun R, Yanzhuo D, Jieke C. [Separation and Determination of Polylols by High-performance Capillary Electrophoresis With Laser-based Interference Refractive Index Detector]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1993;21(12):1374-7. Chinese.
  96. Peng W, Liu Y, Zhang X, Cheng F, Han M. High sensitivity evanescent field refractometer based on modal interference in micro-capillary wall. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2014;14(2):430-5. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2283972
  97. Sørensen HS, Larsen NB, Latham JC, Bornhop DJ, Andersen PE. Highly sensitive bio-sensing based on interference from light scattering in capillary tubes. Applied physics letters. 2006;89(15):151108. doi: 10.1063/1.2356380
  98. Sonehara T, Kojima K, Irie T. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy excited with a stationary interference pattern for capillary electrophoresis. Analytical chemistry. 2002;74(19):5121-31. doi: 10.1021/ac0201326
  99. Xiong B, Miao X, Zhou X, Deng Y, Zhou P, Hu J. Simultaneous coaxial thermal lens spectroscopy and retro-reflected beam interference detection for capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatog-raphy A. 2008;1209(1):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.042

Downloads

Published

2017-12-22

How to Cite

Gradov, O. V., Nasirov, F. A., Skrynnik, A. A., & Jablokov, A. G. (2017). A simple device for microinjections, manipulations and measurements using an electromorphological chip under mi-crointerferometric control of the interface and membrane processes at the thickness range of 5-1000 nm at different angles. Морфологія / Morphologia / Morfologìâ, 11(4), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2017.4.7-17

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017)

Section

Статті

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Morphologia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the Journal the right to the first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which allows other people to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
        By submitting a manuscript to the editorial office of the Journal ‘Morphologia’ authors agree to transfer the rights to protect and use the manuscript (all supplemental materials, particularly protected objects such as photos, drawings, diagrams, tables, etc.), including the reproduction in the press and distribution via the Internet; translation of the manuscript into any language; export and import of journal copies with the Authors’ article in order to make it available for public. Authors convey the rights mentioned above to the editorial office without any temporal or territorial limitation all over the world. 
        The Authors guarantee that they have the exclusive rights to use the material transferred to editorial office. Editors are not responsible to third parties for contraventions of warranty given by the Authors. The considered rights are transferred to the editorial office since the moment when the current issue is signed for publishing. Reproduction of materials published in the Journal by other individuals and legal entities is possible only with the consent of Editorial office, with the obligatory indication of the full bibliographic reference of the primary publication. The Authors reserve the right to use the published material, its fragments and parts for teaching materials, oral presentations, dissertation thesis prepararion with obligatory bibliographic citation of the original paper. Electron copy of the published article, downloaded from official journal web-site in .pdf format may be put by authors on the official web-site of their institutions, any other official resources with open access.